I'm not entirely sold on the stringerless XTR construction. There seems to be a lot of people that had one buckle prematurely.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I think stringerless it's fine for a grovel board.I'm not entirely sold on the stringerless XTR construction. There seems to be a lot of people that had one buckle prematurely.
seems it broke right after the carbon stopped. looks to create a weak point where you need the most strength, major design flaw. still interested in the SL-C construction, any ride reports?View attachment 101218
yeah it was, I honestly had more durable team light PU boards from CI, and that's not saying a lot. When I took it to Dan Taylor a few weeks back to get the tail reinforced, he mentioned there were hardly any glass, and the nose was off (whatever, it's the nose) but still...
I just sold my Pyzel Astro Pop (5'6" x 19 1/2" x 2 3/8", 28.6L) in SL-C and 8.C glassing. There was an QC issue that has been discussed ad nauseam earlier in this thread and was rectified by XTR with a replacement board.seems it broke right after the carbon stopped. looks to create a weak point where you need the most strength, major design flaw. still interested in the SL-C construction, any ride reports?
Oh yeah I made a post a few weeks back about the issue, the leash on my board (the flap part, not the string, I know how to tie a proper leash string hehe) started to eat into my board less than a month into my use, and it was getting to the point where it was eating through the foam and my tail was starting to get squishy, I contacted Shey about it, and they told me to drop it off overnight in their shop to "add some reinforcement", but for me, it wasn't worth the time and money to drop off a board 80 miles away from where I live overnight, so I just went to Dan Taylor to help me get the reinforcement. I will put up some pictures of the nose later...What do you mean "to get the tail reinforced?" What did you have done?
I'm with you, my last 8.0 pyzel ghost was almost 7lbs+ which was a bit heavier than some of my PU boards.I just sold my Pyzel Astro Pop (5'6" x 19 1/2" x 2 3/8", 28.6L) in SL-C and 8.C glassing. There was an QC issue that has been discussed ad nauseam earlier in this thread and was rectified by XTR with a replacement board.
It's difficult to compare varying constructions across different shapes. The two SL-C boards XTR produced were off the same order card, but had different flex values listed (4 vs. 6) and the second one was noticeably heavier than the first.
I was told SL-C was their recommended construction for those that didn't like the aesthetics of the parallel carbon and though it not have the same desired flex rebound, it was a close second.
To me, XTR's SL-C felt pretty similar flex wise to Future Flex, so more on the stiff side compared to PU. Again, I'm comparing the seven boards I've had owned in Future Flex (+ two I've Awayco'd) to the XTR. The SL-C felt stiffer than my Varial/Infused Glass board, albeit they're all different models, but they're all within four inches in length (5'6' - 5'10") , 2.375" thick and similar volume.
I'm surfing smallish beachbreak 95% of the time, so I don't think any alt construction's characteristics are going to be exemplified in the waves I'm surfing. I'm mostly riding these alternative constructions to get a little more longevity out of a board's "pop/liveliness" compared to PU and some added durability.
Curious what made you end up selling it? It seemed like you were happy with the replacement board. Sucks to put in all that time and money and end up selling the board.I just sold my Pyzel Astro Pop (5'6" x 19 1/2" x 2 3/8", 28.6L) in SL-C and 8.C glassing. There was an QC issue that has been discussed ad nauseam earlier in this thread and was rectified by XTR with a replacement board.
I was looking for a board to take over the waist high and under stuff from my NB2 and it just didn't have the same instantaneous speed that the NB2 did. It's probably how the rocker works with how I generate speed (more off my front foot). I went through numerous FCSII fin sets/configurations: KA large, FT large, AM Aircore large, KA fronts/Reactor medium rears, AM 2+1, MR 2+1 and there was never an "aha" moment. The board worked perfectly well with all the fin sets, but it just didn't have that extra 5-10% extra that got me excited to keep it. I rode it pretty much exclusively for two months and I'm impressed with the durability with only some pretty minor foot dents to speak of. I don't think my having not loved the board had anything to do with XTR. The replacement board was night and day better than the original one with the rail issue, just did not end up being a favorite.Curious what made you end up selling it? It seemed like you were happy with the replacement board. Sucks to put in all that time and money and end up selling the board.
These stories of QC issues make me sad. Javi seems like the kind of guy who's shop I'd want to support. Obviously all shapers produce the occasional dud, but it does make me wonder what kind of volume they are putting out that there would be this many QC problems.
If there are any issues with the two I've gotten they have escaped my eye. I agree the carbon stopping in the middle of the tail block seems like a strange design decision. The Gremlin I have is a 5-fin and so the PC runs to the quad box which hopefully would help mitigate the issue. The Shadow is a thruster and has the PC all the way to the end of the tail. It's also basically the perfect weight for decent to good waves at just a hair lighter than my PU/PE boards around that size.
Same. Never had an issue with 6-7 XTRs, most stringerless. Last one is SL-C and it's my favorite build so far.I've had like 8 XTR and no issues. Must be lucky.
How old is your board? maybe its a batch issue?Here is mine. It was a very strange looking break. It happened underwater in the whitewash so i dont know what happened. All i know is some idiot who was paddling back out in the take off zone checked his board, so it must have hit his somehow.