I'm on team Elle.Yeah, I know, just having some fun.
Should have put up a Billy Jack item instead of Billy Joel, but the Elle MacPherson tie in was too tough to resist.
I mean, Ms. Brinkley or Ms. MAcPherson?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I'm on team Elle.Yeah, I know, just having some fun.
Should have put up a Billy Jack item instead of Billy Joel, but the Elle MacPherson tie in was too tough to resist.
I mean, Ms. Brinkley or Ms. MAcPherson?
Thanks. I asked the question for a reason. If the father has no say in the other, why should he be on the hook for this?I think GD’s question is legitimate and I answered it legitimately.
Then he can choose not to participate in the financial cost.......No???He's got his say when he sticks it in.
He can choose not to spit out sperm.
The girl gets to choose not to spit out the baby.
No. You don't want to pay, don't shoot cum in pussy.Then he can choose not to participate in the financial cost.......No???
Just the way it is.Thanks. I asked the question for a reason. If the father has no say in the other, why should he be on the hook for this?