REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Utah becomes the first state to mandate “half and a ride”
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
Thanks. I asked the question for a reason. If the father has no say in the other, why should he be on the hook for this?
He's got his say when he sticks it in.
He can choose not to spit out sperm.
The girl gets to choose not to spit out the baby.
He can choose not to spit out sperm.
The girl gets to choose not to spit out the baby.
Then he can choose not to participate in the financial cost.......No???
By the way, I'm not taking a position here. Just exploring where this logic all goes.
No. You don't want to pay, don't shoot cum in pussy.
The man controls the semen; the woman controls the fetus.
Fucking is serious business.
I always knew this and I am a godless heathen.
