Sure, but that does not make you alt or far right automatically.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The Jordan Peterson Thread
- Thread starter HatterasGlass
- Start date
Well yeah, a person typing their thoughts in a tweet is 'one-sided'.
As for context, seriously?
In what context is okay to be homophobic?
Bigotry is not a "different opinion", it should not be in the realm of civil discourse at all.
Well, it is a "different opinion" but no person with an ounce of ethos would take it into consideration in a discussion about anything.
I agree with Hatteras Glass about Twitter in general. But.
Ben Shapiro's collection of tweets should be in a pamphlet titled "How to be an insufferably strident Orthodox-adjacent Zionist who hates Arabs and modern Black America without calling anyone a (sand) ****er"
That he wet himself about the Supreme Court not agreeing with him - like anyone is even asking him to work with gay-married people in the context of their legal union in the course of a day's blabbing at DailyWire - is completely hilarious coming from someone who fancies themselves a rule of law constitutional conservative.
Ben Shapiro's collection of tweets should be in a pamphlet titled "How to be an insufferably strident Orthodox-adjacent Zionist who hates Arabs and modern Black America without calling anyone a (sand) ****er"
That he wet himself about the Supreme Court not agreeing with him - like anyone is even asking him to work with gay-married people in the context of their legal union in the course of a day's blabbing at DailyWire - is completely hilarious coming from someone who fancies themselves a rule of law constitutional conservative.
Dude he's got an h-index of 54. Anything over 20 is very solid. This does not measure popular book sales, it measures peer-reviewed citations. Why you gotta make stuff up?It comes from, he is not respected by his peers, so he packages himself as alternative and goes to Youtube.
Another suggestion for what? What is your interest? Academic study is not about the researcher but about the work. You shouldn't ask for and wait for people to tell you what you should do, and then be angry.
Kids, weird generation.
My God - you're scared of everything.
There is nothing more racist than targeting an ethnic group with a collective crime, regardless of innocence or guilt.
We are in agreement.
I like where Ben comes from and believe me, love to see him troll people - but he got sucked into it too deep.
I would, however, like to see the tweets that either begot - or followed - those.
That's your take on the guy.
If your history on the erBB has shown us anything - its that your take on every topic except for a homeless guy humping your doormat is suspect - at best.
White privilege is Peggy McIntosh's rich old honky lady pipe dream and all the mean spirited dum dums in HR use it as a billy club.
Seems that this bothers you? Let's make a deal. You delete/change your sig that is selectively edited and paraphrased lie, and I'll gladly stop LOLing at your posts.
Just wait till Redryder shows up.
You're not funny, you never have been and you never will be (intentionally anyway). Good humor requires empathy and awareness. You're just mean. The responses are "at," not "with." So go eat a wiener you alt right bootlicker.
That sums up this entire discussion.
The libertarian version of liberty for all, consists entirely of restricting other people's liberties.
I guess nobody told Shapiro that he doesn't have to marry a dude or suck dick, or use pronouns to be respectful or listen to rap or like black people.
Same with Peterson's transphobia, sexism and Marxist white privilege.
Or saying that having to wear a mask is "government tyranny".
Talking about SJW feelings and pettiness
Last edited:
Here is a picture of what I am sayi. I have broken all my crayons on this thread today:Well yeah, a person typing their thoughts in a tweet is 'one-sided'.
As for context, seriously?
In what context is okay to be homophobic?
Bigotry is not a "different opinion", it should not be in the realm of civil discourse at all.
Well, it is a "different opinion" but no person with an ounce of ethos would take it into consideration in a discussion about anything.
(sic) https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=wL1F22UAAAAJ&view_op=list_works
Re social justice and white privilege if it means so much to you quit your job and give it to a person of color. Put up or shut up, cracker barrel.
I hate watching people just sit there and talk on TV/videos (and yes, Kentucky Fried Movie put me into almost eternal sleep when I finally watched it [Catholic Schoolgirls in Trouble was good though]) and would much rather read as it is just faster.
Now, that being said, the rules for life are pretty basic. #3 edges towards having friends so you can use them. #5: That would be tough; I'll keep them away from SUPs. #6: To a degree. But, yeah, a former boss who complained about me going on internet (despite me getting all of work done easily) probably shouldn't have done so considering I knew he was going on massive amounts of porn, including kiddie and gay surfer; I copied the server history onto a disk as leverage on that one. #7: yeah, except for work. #8 I agree with very much; not many seem to these days, though. #11, yeah, that went bad in the movie Kids. #12, pet a feral cat? Screw that. If cracking one off won't get hair on your palms, that will.
Overall, those virtues are relatively simplistic. This child of the 80s says you could do better just by beating Ultima IV. More cerebral than any youtube video, that's for sure.
Suffering as part of the being? Ha! Caught enough inside by enough seemingly endless sets, paddling for an hour before either finally making it out the back or just giving up after getting so close and then having an 8' wave detonate in front of me, knowing there are at least 20 behind it. And this was at the spot I refer to as OB Jr.
Of course, after all that, I'd then take the 1st or 2nd wave of the set, cruise over the back, and then think, oh right, there were waves behind this one. But yeah, beating a retreat when defeated in the water is the exact opposite of suicide. Bottom line: You can learn far more about life and the cruelty of the world from surfing (good waves, not something like Linda Mar or Doheny) than a pundit.
he can be interesting but gets redundant and stale quick.
Peterson seems to have helped individuals with some severe confidence issues which is good.
none of his “rules” are groundbreaking so I’m not exactly losing my mind over what an intellectual he is. And I agree #5 is vomit inducing And ironic in the context of you g minds developing to be critical thinkers and independent.
some of the stuff he does say is pretty cringy. He has his own Puritan ideals of how the world should be that can be just as bad as anyone.
Peterson seems to have helped individuals with some severe confidence issues which is good.
none of his “rules” are groundbreaking so I’m not exactly losing my mind over what an intellectual he is. And I agree #5 is vomit inducing And ironic in the context of you g minds developing to be critical thinkers and independent.
some of the stuff he does say is pretty cringy. He has his own Puritan ideals of how the world should be that can be just as bad as anyone.