REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The Jordan Peterson Thread
- Thread starter HatterasGlass
- Start date
It comes from, he is not respected by his peers, so he packages himself as alternative and goes to Youtube.
Another suggestion for what? What is your interest? Academic study is not about the researcher but about the work. You shouldn't ask for and wait for people to tell you what you should do, and then be angry.
Kids
, weird generation.The WWII labor dynamic and GA Governor are matters of historical fact, not opinion.
Congress hasn't passed any laws regarding use of gender pronouns so you're good there. If Jordan Peterson's employer (in Canada, so not our problem) wants to fire him for not using what people think is their pronoun, killer. It'd happen to me in a fckgn heartbeat if it negatively affected employer revenue.
I can guarantee you if I referred to every Republican as "Trumptard" or every Christian as "Jesus Freak" or "Talking Snake Book Dude" instead of Jim, John, or Joe, they wouldn't appreciate it, even though it's scientifically accurate. If someone with a penis wants me to call them Caitlyn, she, or her, okay, simple request. I don't care. Even if it's scientifically inaccurate.
Pronouns are not a real problem. Not even remotely close to a real problem. Either way. I don't care if Ben Shapiro calls some dude who claims to be a trans women and prefers ma'am sir, and I'll call a paying customer or helpful customer service anything they want.
Fair. Pronouns were an example of the condition and not a be-all-end-all.
The enforced use of pronouns under threat of imprisonment is just the start of a very slippery slope.
Yes - Canada has been the only nation (stupipd enough) to pass a bill to that effect - but its not too far fetched to think it can't happen here.
You know the pronouns in question though, right?
I work with people who post their pronouns.
I want to post "Pronouns: I, me, my, mine."
I wonder if anyone would get the joke?
As for Jordan Peterson, the clinical psychologist with 3 million followers on YouTube, an "intelectual" who rants about the "Marxist lie" of white privilege and how millennials need to drop the idea of "social justice." His transphobic, sexist and racist rants, made him become a celebrity to (mostly) white and straight, right leaning men like him.
How are you forced to use pronouns and who went to prison for it?
Please provide link, thanks.
1. I am not aware Canada did that. Looking at this Fox source, from 2018, it's "sh!t that never happened". It may have happened since, but that's not what I found in .02 seconds of googling. Since I don't care that much about Canada's pronoun laws, I'm just not motivated to do any more homework on it, but if you have something hard/fast, I'd check it out.
NOT REAL NEWS: No jail in Canada for misusing gender pronoun
An online story falsely claims Canadians now can be jailed simply for using an incorrect gender pronoun.
www.foxnews.com
Regarding that happening here, I agree at some of the state legislature levels. Someone from a very left-wing zone introduces this to the State Assembly, 80% of the body rolls their eyes, and/or it gets BTFO and told to GTFO in court.
I just don't see how you can pass a law like this in this day and age in the US. Maybe in 100-150 years. Otherwise, you're never getting that through as an amendment (it sounds awfully incompatible with the first as it stands today), and the Courts (it was the uber-liberal 9th circuit that overturned CA's hi-cap mag ban) aren't going for it, for decades. Period.
2. No. I'd probably only use their first name and/or fckp constantly, although pronouns are normally when people aren't around. You know what happens if I serve sh!t on http instead of https? I get told to GTFO. I must adapt. CAPITALISM WILLS IT!
Like Kento, I've never heard of Peterson. Reading these 12 rules up until the last two which are amusingly specific is like reading fortune cookies. I can't really criticize them. They're all pretty basic things that he can't really claim to own as some kind of guru to better living. Just like christians can't claim to own basic concepts of decency such as "love thy neighbor" and "though shall not kill".
I'm going to put signs up with my pronouns. Mayport. Pier. Sebastian Inlet. Stuart. Palm Beach.
My preferred pronouns from biological males and women I don't want to have sex with are "Guy we're all giving the best left of each set to" and "Guy we're letting high-hole us the spot every mullet pod, shout for the bridge net if you're on the jetty."
My preferred pronoun from women I want to have sex with is "Guy who will have his brains f----d completely out due to my hotness and cowgirl twerking skills".
Tweets are notoriously one-sided, responsive, and devoid of context.
I'm sure we could both produce tweets from both sides that don't look good.
If bigotry is the intolerance of those who hold different opinions than you - look no further than today's headlines.
If this search was worth a sh!t and half the old threads weren't nuked on account of crazy creeper-ness or GWS's feelz, I'd be bumping you clowning Kermit in an old thread right after I topped grapedrink (LOLOLOLOLOL!!!) 's posts in threads about Stephen Miller and about a dozen other people he's "never heard of".
I think that may be the point though.
Its a lot simpler than we all make it out to be.
We love to make things complicated.
So why are we on page three of a thread discussing a guy who's basically repackaging and selling you fortune cookies without the cookie? Are you on a diet?
BS. Right leaning, sure. Examples of JPs bigotry, inflammatory, and far-right leanings please. Refusing to play make believe in regards to pronouns does not count.
Point-blank, a shitload of people disagree with a shitload of other people with respect to gender pronouns, trans people, and bigotry. But religious bigotry, when religion is at least as much a choice as gender identity, is totally considered a thing by a shitload of the subset who don't think the pronouns thing is an example of bigotry.
Purposely throwing out a sir/ma'am to troll someone is not impartial. At all.
Cool copy and paste bro. Ranting about marxism and social justice is not racist in and of itself, unless the statements he makes are actually racist. What actually racist statements did he make?