Well, lets try to break this down:
Do you believe that he withheld aid and a meeting making it conditional on V's announcing an investigation of trump?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Obstruction of Congress
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
Do you believe that he withheld aid and a meeting making it conditional on V's announcing an investigation of trump?
With all of your bitching and moaning about framing I'd think you'd make a better case than this.
I’m done with the whole “if you disagree with me you’re dumb” line of argument. The whole cognitive dissonance track is simply a gussied up version of thatIt's ironic that to avoid cognitive dissonance, you responded the way you did.
it’s cognitive dissonance to not realize that’s what’s happening here
Lying about “weapons of mass destruction“ to get us into a war in a foreign country, a war that caused death and injury to millions of people and further destabilized an entire region of the world.
Wrong, but you don't appear to care much about getting anything right.
Exhibiting some classic simian characteristics there, friend.
Your line of thinking precludes the idea that you and some of the more willfully stupid posters could be wrong.
Which is silly.
I've never denied the possibility of being wrong, and when I have been wrong, I have admitted it.
Your line of thinking suggests that only your opinions and the opinions your share with certain others are correct
You got that from my referencing of motivated reasoning?
Just because I accuse people of motivated reasoning it doesn't follow that the person is NOT using motivated reasoning.
Gross dummy is the king of it.
A text book case.
Let's broaden your frame a little:
Aid was withheld and then released.
Okay, do we agree on that?
.
Last edited:
Sure, maybe dems were just changing their mind on what to "pin on him".
Or maybe their view of the actions evolved as more information came out, more people came forward, more people refused to testify and the timeline became more clear.
There are cases at SCOTUS that will either confirm or poke holes in the immunity defense.
Maybe the 12 people with more direct knowledge will totally exonerate the President. Just like the Mueller report.
As you run from the store implies you are outside, since well, you can't really run inside a store.
Wait until after charges are presented before you assume anything as been dropped, because, you know, ASSume...
