REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Both Hitler and stalin were avid church goers in their youth, thats where they learned all their tricks.In the 20th century alone, all manner of Godless Communists, Socialists and National Socialists killed more humans than every religion combined, ever, and it ain't even close.
How about those Crusades?In the 20th century alone, all manner of Godless Communists, Socialists and National Socialists killed more humans than every religion combined, ever, and it ain't even close.
Lance posts like faux news addled 80 year old with encroaching DementiaHow about those Crusades?
Assuming for a second that your ridiculous claim is correct and that transgenderism is a religion that disregards science.Or transgender to religion.
We're entering a new age where politics and social views are religion.
Add to that facts don't matter and science is the enemy.
Bringing up religion as it was in the worldview of 1000 A.D. and relating it to present is pretty dishonest.How about those Crusades?
That's because you're misusing the term "gaslighting." As psychologists keep telling us.I find strawmaning and slanting and gaslighting to be interchangeable.
You used the exact opposite of this argument to defend biblical literalists, another one intellectually incapable of good faith debateBringing up religion as it was in the worldview of 1000 A.D. and relating it to present is pretty dishonest.
He said the non religious killed more recently.Bringing up religion as it was in the worldview of 1000 A.D. and relating it to present is pretty dishonest.
I don’t believe in god. It’s not my job, or my interest, to convince others god doesn’t exist. If my mom is happy believing it, I’m happy to play along.Way to stick by your convictions. It explains a lot.
.
Not only that but there's a difference between killing in the name of religion and killing because you happened to have absence of religion.He said the non religious killed more recently.
Mentioning the Crusades isn't dishonesty
It's a broad frame.
The fact that CS needed a narrow frame shows he's the one who not being honest.
Uh, no.You used the exact opposite of this argument to defend biblical literalists, another one intellectually incapable of good faith debate
“The intent of gaslighting really is to cause confusion and sow the seeds of doubt,” Martinez says. “It can be a very coercive and controlling tactic.”That's because you're misusing the term "gaslighting." As psychologists keep telling us.
Gaslighting, Narcissist, and More Psychology Terms You're Misusing
Mental-health experts say we often use psychology terms incorrectly—and that's a problemtime.comWhy Is the Term 'Gaslighting' So Popular Now ─ and So Misused?
It's a term that's often used in an argument. But gaslighting has a very specific meaning that is often lost. What is it and how can you know if you're really being gaslighted?health.howstuffworks.com
TDS is pure gaslighting.“The intent of gaslighting really is to cause confusion and sow the seeds of doubt,” Martinez says. “It can be a very coercive and controlling tactic.”
People do that all the time here.
Trump does it all the time.
Those here who parrot trump do it too.
Maybe the trump guys here are victim of trumps gaslighting too?
Like I said, I find it odd they don't mention the framing effect.
No, he compared to the godless in or maybe since the 20th century compared to religious across all timeHe said the non religious killed more recently.
Mentioning the Crusades isn't dishonesty
It's a broad frame.
The fact that CS needed a narrow frame shows he's the one who not being honest.
None of those leaders killed in the name of godlessness. They killed for power and used a ban on religion to keep it.In the 20th century alone, all manner of Godless Communists, Socialists and National Socialists killed more humans than every religion combined, ever, and it ain't even close.