REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
What is Meddling?
- Thread starter GromsDad
- Start date
A) The types of, and extent of, Putin's interference in the 2016 election are unprecedented.GromsDad said:
B) While difficult to measure, the Russian intelligence operations absolutely had some sort of effect on the election. Millions of dollars aren't spent on elections because they DON'T have an effect.
C) Dishonest Republicans don't want to face the fact that their candidate may indeed have benefitted from foreign intervention. It clearly happened, but they want to shut down any investigation into it because it embarrasses them and makes them look like traitors. Every attempt to block those investigations is further proof of their traitorous intent.
We're all gonna die.
Any day now. Maybe tomorrow.
BTW Hillary spent HUNDREDS of millions of dollars; twice as much as Trump. That just had to have been of effect on the election, right? Except that it didn't.
Maybe she'll do better next time.
okestick:
Any day now. Maybe tomorrow.
BTW Hillary spent HUNDREDS of millions of dollars; twice as much as Trump. That just had to have been of effect on the election, right? Except that it didn't.
Maybe she'll do better next time.
okestick:
She didn't spend that money because it DIDN'T have an effect. It most certainly did. She won the popular vote by a huge margin, she just didn't win the 80,000 votes she really needed in 3 states.GDaddy said:We're all gonna die.
Any day now. Maybe tomorrow.
BTW Hillary spent HUNDREDS of millions of dollars; twice as much as Trump. That just had to have been of effect on the election, right? Except that it didn't.
Maybe she'll do better next time.
The Comey effect, combined with the Putin effect, outweighed that money.
So did the fact that she's just plain unlikeable. That's always been a given.
BTW, when you keep writing "we're all gonna die," you come across like Alex Jones imagining a Clinton Presidency.
Hillary's popular vote margin was completely made possible by California.
Without California she would've lost even the popular vote.
Without California she would've lost even the popular vote.
You're not aware of any meddling between usa/russia prior to the 2016 election????? Are you really that naive???? Meddling in other nations affairs and preventing other nations from meddling in ours is the entire fooking reason the CIA exists you freaking moron!!!! You're just unaware until now because you're stupid and and because its the first time a bunch of sore losers on your team decided to use it as a weak excuse for why they lost.Uberkuque said:
If only I had made those two fouls shots, I would’ve won the game
Not my bad though, because those Russian fans were in the audience screaming at me to miss
Not my bad though, because those Russian fans were in the audience screaming at me to miss
When the democrats bring up the popular vore they sound like sore losers complaining about the refs and the rules after they got beaten soundly on the field. Its the stuff most kids learn not to do by the time they are 12.Surfdog said:
A: You sure about that? How do you know? Do you have inside information?Gnudz said:
B: If what you say is true, what remedy do you suggest to right this wrong and from preventing it in the future?
C: You're confused. Defending the government from being overthrown and undermined by you sore losers is not proof of republican traitorous intent..........[size:14pt]it is a reaction to the traitorous intent of Democrats[/size].......because sore losers.
They like participation trophies though. You know, now that I think about it the way the democrats are dealing with their loss is probably a result of the Participation Trophy phenomenon. They can't accept a loss and move on like normal people. They are pitching a fit because they didn't get a trophy this time and its just not fair.BillyOcean said:
Trick question- sports are sexistGromsDad said:
Elections too
Losing is like getting one’s pussy grabbed
Yeah, the NBA and NFL are rife with Republicans.BillyOcean said:
Well, the airball league (White Man's Disease required) is probably pretty solidly Republican.
I guess Republicans probably dominate softball and lacrosse, but those are lesbian sports.