REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Quotas have been illegal for decades and an allegation in a civil lawsuit isn't proof to the contrary. Race/gender have repeatedly been held to be ok as a factor when considering an applicant, but the law is quite clear that they can't be the sole factor.GDaddy said:That's what Harvard is at trial for right now.
There have been hiring and promotion quotas in various gov't agencies for years. Do you intend to dispute their existence?
It didn’t get ratified.afoaf said:oh, you got me!
**amendment
YES!ifallalot said:It didn’t get ratified.afoaf said:oh, you got me!
**amendment
Did you mean the Civil Rights Act?
If the ERA actually got ratified it would be a good thing to end all of the special protections women get and don’t need
?FecalFace said:When did you explain the hardships and discrimination you endured?ifallalot said:I've explained many times, but why waste the typing when you know more about me than I do?