REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I get what you’re saying, but I feel there’s a smoothness to Burch’s boards whereas Tomo’s are more slashy. Both the Vader and the Picklefork need clean conditions to really go tho.Seeing the Burch thread pop up, then watching the Tomo clip of him on a 5'1" Vader at Trestles gave me an apipheny.
For myself the Cymatic I have now is probably the closest board I can have to be able to draw the same kind of lines on a wave as with a Burch picklefork.
Not that they would actually happen as I imagine of course.
I think of that Haleiwa Slater clip on the Cymatic and Bryce Young on the picklefork in his last movie and equate them to be similar in the "mind machine" category (I just made that category up) of surfing. Go wherever you want on a wave with the capacity to do short arc turns and instantaneous line adjustments on a wave that other more conventional boards don't seem to facilitate as effortlessly.
Anyone else with me on this Tomo/Burch similarity or am I tripping?
Long description ayDescription of the Vader 2.0
The Tomo Vader has returned with the addition of the Vee Quad Concave hull design (VQC)
A fresh perspective on perhaps the most 'disruptive design in modern surfing' VADER V2 is set to make another major stir with optimisation of the outline, bottom contour and nose entry curves.
This 'ultra high performance' design once again defies traditional logic and offers an incredibly intuitive ride quality, effortless rail to rail transitions and an almost supernatural acceleration through turns.
Despite the tiny dimensions, the rectangular outline combined with the deep spine like nature of the of the Vee bottom , provide a balanced volume distribution under the chest for comfortable paddling and great wave catching, while still maintaining a fine rail profile for sensitive rail control.
Tomo strongly feels the Vader2.0 is "the Fastest surfboard design in Modern Surfing" and will level up the surfing of anyone who rides it.
- For good surfers looking for maximum perfomance: Size Vader V2 at 5-6 inches shorter than customers standing height ( or equal to the tip of ones nose) same volume as lowest functional comfortable level or minus 1 L from a traditional performance shape.
- Quad fin or 5 box setup recommended.
- Best suited for Good To Advanced Surfers.
Will yours be one of the 20 true hand touched?Here ya go!
Those boards in Carbon look so mental. Its like October 2011 all over again. Seeing Tomo's designs in Carbon is meant to be. Built in USA too for all you domestic guys. lol
View attachment 171502
View attachment 171499
View attachment 171500
View attachment 171501
How does the Vader work over sized? Ive seen RK ride planing hulls (cant remember which) really long
Never ridden or even held a vader. Why is it not a better graveler with that parallel-railed outline? Rockered for good /steeper waves?I get what you’re saying, but I feel there’s a smoothness to Burch’s boards whereas Tomo’s are more slashy. Both the Vader and the Picklefork need clean conditions to really go tho.
Its basically just a Vee bottom entry into a quad concave out the tail. Super responsive on turns with the Vee spine entry... but has speed and hold from the QISC out the tail.While I appreciate he’s willing to think outside the box… Sounds complicated / overdesigned.
A penny for GG’s thoughts LOL
Unless there is a mini Vee down the middle of the concave I don't see how its possible to have a Vee in a concave? Maybe it was a typo? I have a text that says "its more of a double concave spine that blends into a quad concave through the fins". Also, when I did a picnic table interview with Tomo at the boardroom show, I asked him about whether or not the VQC was a dedicated thruster or not and he went on to say that minor adjustments could be made to make it work as a thruster, but he would have to make the Vee in the front with a concave out the back, but it would be difficult to blend into the rocker. He may have already been experimenting with this bottom when I interviewed him? I dont know?From the Tomo quote in my above post:
"This new board I’ve got a new hull configuration which is like a spine double-concave Vee hull that blends into a quad-concave Vee out the tail."
Frosty said:
"With this new blend of the Vee into the Quad Inside Single."
What am I missing here? It's gotta be one or the other.