First, let me just say that the Ranch is sacred land. It's been sacred for the Native American Chumash Indians, not sacred because it has a bunch of surf spots. I'd rather that land be untouched, period.
The Ranch owners are a mixed bunch, but a lot of them are fk-heads. I'm not surprised this is happening. They've generated a lot of bad karma. This I have no doubt about. If you've ever met or dealt with some of the ranch owners in or out of the water, you know exactly what I'm talking about. If they had just been slightly more flexible, there wouldn't have been so much anger and animosity driving these public access rulings (i.e. they would've had more people on their side). They even managed to irritate enough people in power that this bill was expedited through this time.
It's fine if the ranch owners want to protect their property rights, but don't give me that self righteous moral crap about preserving the sanctity of the Hollister Ranch. The true stewards of the land are the Chumash Indians.
The Ranch owners are a mixed bunch, but a lot of them are fk-heads. I'm not surprised this is happening. They've generated a lot of bad karma. This I have no doubt about. If you've ever met or dealt with some of the ranch owners in or out of the water, you know exactly what I'm talking about. If they had just been slightly more flexible, there wouldn't have been so much anger and animosity driving these public access rulings (i.e. they would've had more people on their side). They even managed to irritate enough people in power that this bill was expedited through this time.
It's fine if the ranch owners want to protect their property rights, but don't give me that self righteous moral crap about preserving the sanctity of the Hollister Ranch. The true stewards of the land are the Chumash Indians.
Last edited: