the government shouldn't be involved in that but fair enough. but give the rest of the thread a scroll and see if you're similarly comforted.
The ones I might find disconcerting so far, it's an incredibly tightly cropped screenshot with very little context other than Taibbi's assertions.
The ones where he actually gives an explainer and I can read the highlighted bits, so far, kinda yeah, Gimme Mo Dat. Motherfuck Yevgeny Prigozhin; Ukraine voluntarily surrendered a nuclear arsenal rather than wait for organized crime to fucking sell it someone, for the good of all mankind, and they've been invaded for it. Fuck Prigozhin's Youtube content with an amputated rigor mortis-ized penis covered in sores of the herpes and krokodil variety.
I understand some of my team thinks Twitter is a publicly owned utility like nationalized oil or some sh!t. Until that legally happens, like unconstitutional red flag laws, I'm more worried about the letter of the law and Twitter's right to do what's best for Twitter vs my team getting what their feels want.
Is it clear on if people flagged as Iranian misinformation were voted on by a cabal of Twitter employees and CLERKS, or was it perhaps some very rough guardrails were defined, and someone got good boy points for how fast an algorithm autonomously flagged sh!t and that content was unflagged on appeal?
I mean throughout all of this I have seen people up in arms because they couldn't tweet for less than 24 hours. Not a big deal to me.