Please Autoprax, bestow upon me that knowledge and perspective you were attempting to relay to my edible root tuber brain, such that I may, at least as pertains one thread of one issue, ascend to your all-knowing level, oh cum-spraying one.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Technology and Dissenting Opinions
- Thread starter crustBrother
- Start date
They get attacked in what they see as unfairly by the left wing twitter mob.
Then it's on.
Rogan is still crying that he said people should take horse paste.
"It's an anti parasitic!"
That really sent him over the edge.
The audience capture was complete.
Last edited:
People who want civil liberties are "RIGHT WING."By who exactly?I don't see him playing to right wing interests. Except for calling out government involvement in controlling Covid narratives, which has been labeled "right wing"
The West's Betrayal of Freedom
Westerners once endlessly propagandized "freedom" as the ultimate democratic virtue. Now, in fear of revolt, the leaders of these countries are mounting an opposite campaign
www.racket.news
MT blew it when he dropped a wildly lopsided analysis
he comes across as having a bone to pick regardless of what the actual facts are
I loved his work for Rolling Stone and used to parse his substack pretty regularly
we need to figure out a way to take the profit motive out of journalism or we are doomed
the Fairness Doctrine should be re-introduced
he comes across as having a bone to pick regardless of what the actual facts are
I loved his work for Rolling Stone and used to parse his substack pretty regularly
we need to figure out a way to take the profit motive out of journalism or we are doomed
the Fairness Doctrine should be re-introduced
No. It just shows what some of us have always known- that the government has their finger on the scale and gets Twitter to push their preferred narrative. Next
And it only matters in the instances the (D) do it. Not worth mentioning when the (R) do it.
Kind of like the (R) President paying Stormi is a witch hunt, but the (D) Vice President/President's kid paying @weedslut420 is the end of the world.
I never said that. I'm universal in my disdain for any sort of government intervention, especially in the media.
SA on audience capture
podclips.com
Sam Harris: If It Weren't for Trumpistan, Dave Rubin Wouldn't Have a Career
Sam Harris: What The Hell Happened?
podclips.com
except, of course, the facts indicate that no one has the thumb on the scale and that "your team" was guilty of it while the opposing one was not
Not sure what "team" you are speaking of
Twitter basically gave the gubmint a seat at the table. Alex Berenson was a perfect example of this.
they gave public health officials a seat at the tableNot sure what "team" you are speaking of
Twitter basically gave the gubmint a seat at the table. Alex Berenson was a perfect example of this.
do you get this upset when your mobile phone carrier disseminates an amber alert or a flood warning?
The Berenson request came directly from the white house. Public health officials lolololol
No, because those messages are truthful and don't have an agenda behind them
yes, public health officials
lolololol
:haha: :haha: :haha:
who else has a vested interest in getting that whinger to stfu?
So much this.
We took profit motive out of other things that are essential for a healthy democracy but doing it with journalism would send libertarian types into a tailspin.
They've been freaking out about the NPR, imagine if there was a US version of the BBC.
Big pharma and the government. Government has been in the business of crushing domestic dissent for decades if not over century. Now they can use big tech and media as a proxy to do their dirty work, because for them to do so would be unconstitutional.
Murka fug yeah!
you don't need government subsidies if you force networks to practice the fairness doctrine and enforce it with teeth.So much this.
We took profit motive out of other things that are essential for a healthy democracy but doing it with journalism would send libertarian types into a tailspin.
They've been freaking out about the NPR, imagine if there was a US version of the BBC.
Fox rose from the grave of the Fairness Doctrine
it would not exist in its current, stupefying form if it were required to give equal treatment to both sides of the argument
as the discovery that has been released from the Dominion lawsuit shows us, what the talking heads and the executives personally believe is a far cry from what they vomit up for the cameras...and they knowingly and willingly play their cancerous game all in the name of preserving their audience viewership
it's fkn gross
100% agree.
I used BBC as an example because a lot of people in Americas think it's a commie news source and that it's "government run". lolo
As this thread clearly shows, trying to enforce any kind of journalistic ethic would be viewed as an attack on 1A.
There are just way too many people who benefit from spreading misinformation, from corporations to GromsDads who must have their bias confirmation fix daily.
Thankfully we have Taibbi (lefty) and former Sandinista volunteer Shellenberger.
Twitter could easily have told the government to fuck off. It's not like they operate under an FCC license or anything like that.