Should we provide Cluster Bombs to Ukraine?

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
32,395
12,461
113
They should be given everything...or nothing. Bleeding Ukraine of resources and generations of people just to hurt Russia is diabolical. Either give them the tools they need or get the fuck over it.
Amen.
 

Driftcoast

Michael Peterson status
Aug 5, 2002
3,469
957
113
They should be given everything...or nothing. Bleeding Ukraine of resources and generations of people just to hurt Russia is diabolical. Either give them the tools they need or get the fuck over it.
Clusterbombs are the first step in this process, celebrate the baby steps!
 

Autoprax

Duke status
Jan 24, 2011
68,959
23,548
113
62
Vagina Point
They should be given everything...or nothing. Bleeding Ukraine of resources and generations of people just to hurt Russia is diabolical. Either give them the tools they need or get the fuck over it.
The west had their reasons for this.

One of which was escalation.

Maybe the slow drain was the best way to go.

Maybe not.

Magic 8 ball dont know.

As far as bleeding the Ukrainians.

They want to fight.

Who are we to stop them from wanting to be conquered?

History is full of people who chose to die rather than be subjugated.

They were supposed to be conquered in 4 days.

Haha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trevorbc

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
89,321
18,301
113
The west had their reasons for this.

One of which was escalation.

Maybe the slow drain was the best way to go.

Maybe not.

Magic 8 ball dont know.

As far as bleeding the Ukrainians.

They want to fight.

Who are we to stop them from wanting to be conquered?

History is full of people who chose to die rather than be subjugated.

They were supposed to be conquered in 4 days.

Haha.
Who’s stopping them from fighting? They can fight to the last man. Just don’t make me fund it
 

Autoprax

Duke status
Jan 24, 2011
68,959
23,548
113
62
Vagina Point
Who’s stopping them from fighting? They can fight to the last man. Just don’t make me fund it
Yes, you are an isolationist.

But would not a agree that is kind of unrealistic at the point?

We're never going back to being isolationist.

That to me seems like another expression of your teenage boy fantasy tropes, which you are so fond of.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: afoaf and Ifallalot

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
89,321
18,301
113
Yes, you are an isolationist.

But would not a agree that is kind of unrealistic at the point?

We're never going back to being isolationist.

That to me seems like another expression of your teenage boy fantasy tropes, which you are so fond of.
Why is it unrealistic? Why do you think we need to be involved in every conflict around the world?
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
89,321
18,301
113
We got the Ol Joe acolytes in the house!

1689002170090.png

NATO is a net negative for the United States, the thoughts of a 2nd World Eastern European failing shithole are meaningless in the discussion of it
 

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
69,245
21,760
113
The Bar
There's a simpler solution.

Let Russia completely take over Ukraine, subjugate its citizens, etc.

And then WE nuke it. Thoroughly.

Many problems solved.


Besides, come on people, if we're not getting in any significant conflicts, how else will the MIC justify next year's increased budget?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot