Thanks for posting that.
I saw this article about it yesterday...
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
"You’d think that they would look at all the data, all the pro’s and con’s, economic consequences, public health consequences, etc., and make an informed, rational decision.
But that doesn’t seem to happen anymore.
There can be no rational discourse on the topic.
You’re not allowed to ask any questions or express any intellectual dissent, otherwise you’ll be denounced as a conspiracy theorist.
You have one job: obey. It’s not even about ‘trusting the science’ anymore, as we’ve been told to do over and over again during the pandemic. Because now the science tells us that mask mandates “have the potential” to reduce Covid growth rates by just 1.32%.
Not that you’ll hear this in the media.
There actually was a bonanza of coverage over the weekend about the CDC’s new report. The
Washington Post headline read “After states lift restrictions, CDC says mask mandates can reduce deaths”.
The
New York Times reported that “Wearing masks, the [CDC] study reported, was linked to fewer infections with the coronavirus and Covid-19 deaths.”
NBC called the report “strong evidence that mask mandates can slow the spread of the coronavirus. . .”
But very little of the media coverage bothered to mention the real data, i.e. the marginal 1.32% reduction in growth rates.
Just like the CDC’s influenza data, it’s incredible that the media expects to be taken seriously, or that they pass themselves off as an objective, unbiased source of information."
...what you can't continue to do is to tear down existing scientific pillars without presenting
a sound,
scientifically substantiated alternative.
Afoaf....is this CDC study scientifically substantiated enough for you?
As if that even means something....
Here's another piece on The Great Reset from Sky News Australia....