*** Official Corona Virus Thread ***

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
12,852
8,894
113
I bet gavin personally asked her to call you that son of a bitch.
What do you think's motivating this? CDPH found a seroprevalence of close to 80% in those over 18 a year ago before the Delta wave. Then they stopped taking data. Omicron spread much more easily. We've gotta be at 100% by now. What motivates the continued push for more shots?
 

crustBrother

Kelly Slater status
Apr 23, 2001
9,351
5,560
113

"The effectiveness of previous infection alone against symptomatic BA.2 infection was 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.5 to 51.9). The effectiveness of vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 and no previous infection was negligible (−1.1%; 95% CI, −7.1 to 4.6), but nearly all persons had received their second dose more than 6 months earlier. The effectiveness of three doses of BNT162b2 and no previous infection was 52.2% (95% CI, 48.1 to 55.9). The effectiveness of previous infection and two doses of BNT162b2 was 55.1% (95% CI, 50.9 to 58.9), and the effectiveness of previous infection and three doses of BNT162b2 was 77.3% (95% CI, 72.4 to 81.4). Previous infection alone, BNT162b2 vaccination alone, and hybrid immunity all showed strong effectiveness (>70%) against severe, critical, or fatal Covid-19 due to BA.2 infection. Similar results were observed in analyses of effectiveness against BA.1 infection and of vaccination with mRNA-1273."
 
Last edited:

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
12,852
8,894
113

"The effectiveness of previous infection alone against symptomatic BA.2 infection was 46.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.5 to 51.9). The effectiveness of vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 and no previous infection was negligible (−1.1%; 95% CI, −7.1 to 4.6), but nearly all persons had received their second dose more than 6 months earlier. The effectiveness of three doses of BNT162b2 and no previous infection was 52.2% (95% CI, 48.1 to 55.9). The effectiveness of previous infection and two doses of BNT162b2 was 55.1% (95% CI, 50.9 to 58.9), and the effectiveness of previous infection and three doses of BNT162b2 was 77.3% (95% CI, 72.4 to 81.4). Previous infection alone, BNT162b2 vaccination alone, and hybrid immunity all showed strong effectiveness (>70%) against severe, critical, or fatal Covid-19 due to BA.2 infection. Similar results were observed in analyses of effectiveness against BA.1 infection and of vaccination with mRNA-1273."
Monica Ghandi has been saying this for months, but in order for the government to acknowledge it they would first have to acknowledge natural immunity and stop lying about it. I would look at this paper as a marketing strategy, "People are tired of getting boosters, the biggest market is the resisters/previously-infected."

Look for them to make up a new set of lies in September. Actually, they're running the cycle again right now.
1656526869031.png
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Ifallalot

crustBrother

Kelly Slater status
Apr 23, 2001
9,351
5,560
113
Monica Ghandi has been saying this for months
We've known for well over a year and that knowledge predates virtually all of the vax mandates.


Science and rationale do not influence peoples' thought process nearly as much as ideology/religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRCD

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
12,852
8,894
113
We've known for well over a year and that knowledge predates virtually all of the vax mandates.


Science and rationale do not influence peoples' thought process nearly as much as ideology/religion.
Yep. You've got it. Science will likely not survive the Age of Ideology. The CDC is advocating mindless jabbing now.
 

crustBrother

Kelly Slater status
Apr 23, 2001
9,351
5,560
113
Yep. You've got it. Science will likely not survive the Age of Ideology.
I think the scientific method will survive, but the magic thinking part of science - formation of hypothesis - will be so influenced by ideology that it will be horribly crippled

The CDC is advocating mindless jabbing now.
I advocate that the CDC mindlessly suck my dong.

:dancing:
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRCD

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
12,852
8,894
113
The CDC told us the vaccines had no effect on fertility then later admitted they affect women’s menstrual cycles “temporarily.” Now they’re saying the same thing about sperm count. How can the mRNA vax affect your sperm count or menstrual cycle but not fertility?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: grapedrink

SurfFuerteventura

Rabbitt Bartholomew status
Sep 20, 2014
8,464
4,649
113
Ribbit
No vax, no sticks up my nose, no fear.

Still living my best life somehow.

Frankly, I am perplexed at how I dodge such infectious diseases without succumbing to the 'current thing'....

Z14XY9734562 variant hopeful - out
 
  • Like
Reactions: grapedrink

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
12,852
8,894
113
Telling the truth is ultimately why Kuldorff was kicked off ACIP.

The question of trial data integrity needs to be revisited.

The intrepid Andrew Boston now writes for Brownstone. I met him once at a lecture at USC. Good dude.
 
Last edited:

crustBrother

Kelly Slater status
Apr 23, 2001
9,351
5,560
113
I'm working this weekend because so many of my jabbed and boosted coworkers are down with the rona and somebody gotta pick up the slack. Hope they feel better soon. Also hope they let me bring my immunity-aquired-by-infection back into the office someday

Meanwhile I'm living my best life as a highly productive social outcast.

Got this on as background music while sifting code and troubleshooting a really bizarre bug...


I want to PARTY with all those people!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: grapedrink