How the Teachers Union Broke Public Education
A former public school teacher documents the profound betrayal of America’s students
www.tabletmag.com
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Quite a word salad.How the Teachers Union Broke Public Education
A former public school teacher documents the profound betrayal of America’s studentswww.tabletmag.com
always being the absolute dumbest....
Dangerous order follower! Oh my!Never Forget!!!!
View attachment 155583
Do you dispute that characterization? If so, how? Mask up dummy or you'll kill someone's granny.Dangerous order follower! Oh my!
This is why right wingers aren't funny.Never Forget!!!!
View attachment 155583
When I worked in the private sector I thought unions were totally unnecessary, rusty relics from a previous age. Then I became a teacher and discovered the off-the-charts levels of animosity, disdain, and disrespect school district administration has for the people that do the actual business of the district, which is teaching kids. I think it comes from not attaching a cost to teachers' time. The idea is, "We can give teachers more BS work to do, since their time doesn't cost us anything. We can staff up downtown and then plead poverty during salary negotiations, keeping their salaries low." This philosophy is baked into the DNA of every district, or so it seems; it defines the district/teacher relationship.How the Teachers Union Broke Public Education
A former public school teacher documents the profound betrayal of America’s studentswww.tabletmag.com
What’s dangerous about that scenario?Do you dispute that characterization? If so, how? Mask up dummy or you'll kill someone's granny.
Danger to freedom and liberty.What’s dangerous about that scenario?
Freedom AND liberty? Wow!Danger to freedom and liberty.
Who audits the district? This seems to be the crux (or at least a pillar) of the issue.When I worked in the private sector I thought unions were totally unnecessary, rusty relics from a previous age. Then I became a teacher and discovered the off-the-charts levels of animosity, disdain, and disrespect school district administration has for the people that do the actual business of the district, which is teaching kids. I think it comes from not attaching a cost to teachers' time. The idea is, "We can give teachers more BS work to do, since their time doesn't cost us anything. We can staff up downtown and then plead poverty during salary negotiations, keeping their salaries low." This philosophy is baked into the DNA of every district, or so it seems; it defines the district/teacher relationship.
Teachers want more money and smaller class sizes. All the rest of that crap Mr. Guttentag is bellyaching about is sideshow material, at least in my bright blue coastal SoCal town. Unions may be a necessary evil, but they're really necessary!
The problem is administrationWhen I worked in the private sector I thought unions were totally unnecessary, rusty relics from a previous age. Then I became a teacher and discovered the off-the-charts levels of animosity, disdain, and disrespect school district administration has for the people that do the actual business of the district, which is teaching kids. I think it comes from not attaching a cost to teachers' time. The idea is, "We can give teachers more BS work to do, since their time doesn't cost us anything. We can staff up downtown and then plead poverty during salary negotiations, keeping their salaries low." This philosophy is baked into the DNA of every district, or so it seems; it defines the district/teacher relationship.
Teachers want more money and smaller class sizes. All the rest of that crap Mr. Guttentag is bellyaching about is sideshow material, at least in my bright blue coastal SoCal town. Unions may be a necessary evil, but they're really necessary!
This is a byproduct of collective bargaining. If individual teachers were able to negotiate their own compensation the cream will rise to the top. Those willing to put in more work and produce better results will be rewarded.I think it comes from not attaching a cost to teachers' time. The idea is, "We can give teachers more BS work to do, since their time doesn't cost us anything. We can staff up downtown and then plead poverty during salary negotiations, keeping their salaries low."
maybe it’s because they were custodial staff.This is a byproduct of collective bargaining. If individual teachers were able to negotiate their own compensation the cream will rise to the top. Those willing to put in more work and produce better results will be rewarded.
As it is now there’s no financial incentive for teachers to perform better and there’s no financial cost to admins for getting extra effort from teachers.
I mean why work harder when lazy joe gets paid the same and why pay more for better outcomes when admins don’t have to?
When I worked at Cornell the only people who were union was the custodial staff and they had the worst pay, worst benefits, most inflexible schedules and were the least happy about their employment.
Their union reps made some good money though…
"The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group;"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PubMed
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nothing to see here. Vaccines are perfectly safe and adverse events extremely rare, I read it here first!
Difference of 18 people per 10K cases. Multiply that by hundreds of millions and that's a lot of people. Why the gaslighting?.0000068 is 36% higher than .000005....
what's the baseline?
Over placebo. What about over Covid?"The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group;"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PubMed
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nothing to see here. Vaccines are perfectly safe and adverse events extremely rare, I read it here first!
Irrelevant.Over placebo. What about over Covid?
Irrelevant? Did someone say the vaccine didn’t have risk? Are any vaccines risk free?Irrelevant.