I think these outlines start to get weird when too wide from stonk.sounds like you need to order a 6'4 x 20 x 2.56 Moonstone with a slot channel, and store it indefinitely at my house to hide it from Mrs. Oeste
winner outlinevesper twin
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I think these outlines start to get weird when too wide from stonk.sounds like you need to order a 6'4 x 20 x 2.56 Moonstone with a slot channel, and store it indefinitely at my house to hide it from Mrs. Oeste
winner outlinevesper twin
It could be, I didn't see any details. I've seen channels on both versions.This is the pintail, no?
This seems to have some speed dialer DNA in the bottom contours. Rolled/V in the nose, double concave inside the V in the middle transitioning to a single concave (or in this case flat) through the tail. The double in the middle on yours is more pronounced than what's on my Zamora X-Dialer. I've always like boards with double concave in the middle for some reason.....View attachment 172549Here you go Maz. The bottom constantly transitions. Feels aggressive by hand. Tail is fairly flat transitioning to concave V in the middle to some v to flat in the nose. A lot of nose rocker for a fish dna board.
Sakal's working on one for me I should get soon. He knows the normal tkf I like from him & the dims for that one. I didn't give him any details on the new one, so looking forward to seeing where he goes with me saying "make me a longer fish that isn't too long w/ futures boxes placed for cc's that I can use most days if I wanted".I think these outlines start to get weird when too wide from stonk.
Mine is 6’3 x 19.75 x 2.44Sakal's working on one for me I should get soon. He knows the normal tkf I like from him & the dims for that one. I didn't give him any details on the new one, so looking forward to seeing where he goes with me saying "make me a longer fish that isn't too long w/ futures boxes placed for cc's that I can use most days if I wanted".
When I got my first moonie a few years back, Matt suggested 6'2" x 20.5 x 2.5 to squash it down shorter. I think I told him I was on a 5'6" x 21 at the time. When XTR told me that was 37L of volume I freaked out some and changed it to 6'2" x 20 x 2.44 to bring it to 35L (I normally ride around 33). That ended up working great for me as a dd and I have no problem using it on smaller or bigger days. In @tedshred5 case, 6'4 x 20 x 2.56 sounds great to me. I'd probably just reduce thickness to shave off some overall volume unless that doesn't bother you.
yeah I had a stonk 6'6 Moonie that I sold, I think it would've covered more range for me if it were 2-4" shorter, wider, and slightly thinnerSakal's working on one for me I should get soon. He knows the normal tkf I like from him & the dims for that one. I didn't give him any details on the new one, so looking forward to seeing where he goes with me saying "make me a longer fish that isn't too long w/ futures boxes placed for cc's that I can use most days if I wanted".
When I got my first moonie a few years back, Matt suggested 6'2" x 20.5 x 2.5 to squash it down shorter. I think I told him I was on a 5'6" x 21 at the time. When XTR told me that was 37L of volume I freaked out some and changed it to 6'2" x 20 x 2.44 to bring it to 35L (I normally ride around 33). That ended up working great for me as a dd and I have no problem using it on smaller or bigger days. In @tedshred5 case, 6'4 x 20 x 2.56 sounds great to me. I'd probably just reduce thickness to shave off some overall volume unless that doesn't bother you.
I'd guess a pintail moonie would have more control, maneuverability overall, while needing more push to get going. The sabre has a pretty wide tail and low tail rocker. Its fast and felt more skatey compared to other boards I had at that size. I liked it best on lined up waves that I could just keep it pointed down the line more. Never got a great feel for redirecting it but the board was probably just too big for me. Channels on it looked amazing and it caught waves easily.I wonder how a Sakal Sabre compares to the roundpin channeled version of the Moonie
longer long line stamps tkf. panda wont do shaped blank and $1k for boar with weak glassing is hard passWhat did you order ? Dims?
cant go wrong. Almost want to order a longer one as well.did you get one like @grg