REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
If someone were to chase you in a hostile manner and throw an object at you, while in the dark in a chaotic environment, do you think your mind can discern exactly what the object is on a consistent basis and decide the proper use of force before the object hits you? Especially if there were gunshots immediately before?
Agreed- and Anthony Huber took that risk 100% on his own accord and even chased KR down the street to do that.
If there had been no rioting there would’ve been no problem.
People who can't buy cigs can buy AR 15s
My personal code of morality is relevant to me. It means nothing to you. And vice versa. Our opinions really don't matter.
"Murder" is legal term. You can look it up. "the UNLAWFUL premeditated killing of one human being by another." And that was settled in a court of law. According to the law it wasn't murder. That's just the way it is.
It would have been wrong for me. I would have never placed myself in that situation. I think going into that situation with an open carry weapon was a mistake. I don't want to kill anyone. And I really don't want to be tried or potentially jailed for such. But according to the law, as decided in the trial, legally he did nothing wrong.
No. There are a lot of laws I don't agree with.
You seem to be making an argument for charging Rottenhouse with reckless endangerment or manslaughter.
If someone like Huber came at you with a skateboard would you kill them?
They were trying to disarm him. Why would they have been after him if he didn’t have an assault rifle?
I don’t disagree about to availability of firearms. However I do believe that being able to defend yourself is a fundamental right, and that the burden of proof is on the law to prove that it was not. Which is exactly what happened.
What right do they have to disarm him? He hadn’t even shot anyone at that point.
The guy chased KR down a long road, knocked him to the ground and hit him with a skateboard. I’d say that warrants a bullet in self defense.
