Posting a google list of links and saying "it's in there, go look for it" is not spoon feeding, it's lazy. It's not my job to sift through a bunch of links to look for a statement that doesn't even seem to exist to validate YOUR argument.
Nowhere does it say that the crash was intentional or that he was aiming for anyone.
what's lazy is characterizing it as an execution style attack when there is absolutely zero point zero reporting to that effect
I gave you the list of search results because so many of the articles I read clearly explained how he came to be in that situation that it baffled me why you were describing it the way you were while also omitting the genesis of the event
....and you seem to
still be missing my point
you grab on to a superficial thing, inflate it, and wield that thing in debate
forever...just like the sf school renaming
I understand your political positions, generally, and I think you and I agree on far more than we don't, but I've noticed this a lot lately and it was bugging me.