Again . . . . The point I am making is that every time a disparity is presented in any facet of life, the kneejerk reaction is to point to it and say that "X" is systemically racist/sexist/etc. When in reality, racial disparities in luxury pursuits such as skiing, surfing, sailing, wine tasting etc are easily explained by economics. That is what primarily drives the racial make up of who ultimately ends up on the slopes, not a supposed toxic racist atmosphere that a large bulk of our population can't even afford to experience in the first place.it's not moving the goal posts. your argument is a red herring. I'm not sure how many more ways I can express that here. the question was rhetorical...your demographic numbers are irrelevant; demographics could be different and skiing could still not be "a welcome place to minorities"
holy fk
When the percent of white people in the upper 20% is exactly the same as the % of whites on ski slopes, that should tell you something. Now if you prefer to be data averse and value personal anecdotes over actual numbers, then I really can't help you understand anything because we are basically speaking 2 different languages.