REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Does Trump's Putting Pressure on States to Not Certify Votes Constitute Attempted Election Fraud?
- Thread starter enframed
- Start date
You mean like Democrats did in 2016?
www.cbsnews.com
Which candidates did the seven "faithless" electors support?
This year saw the greatest number of "faithless" electors in history. More of them were untrue to Hillary Clinton than to Donald Trump
www.cbsnews.com
this is conceivably your dumbest "what about" comeback yet....You mean like Democrats did in 2016?
Which candidates did the seven "faithless" electors support?
This year saw the greatest number of "faithless" electors in history. More of them were untrue to Hillary Clinton than to Donald Trump
Openly trying to disenfranchise opposing voters, Republicans do not believe in Democracy.
I was thinking that too.
How can he legally try to sway the election officials?
How can he legally try to sway the election officials?
That Democrat election bosses committed large-scale fraud has been proven in the aggregate ....Stacks of pristine ballots counted, election observers denied access, late ballots predated, a wide-coverage computer voting system which allows officials to conduct vote transfers.
You're demanding that Trump lawyers prove each individual vote fraud. That's physically impossible before the certification deadlines, and that's why you're demanding it. Your criterion might be a valid criterion in a local court of law, but not in the legislative bodies which the Constitution assigns the authority to count votes or in federal courts with jurisdiction to decide whether or not the entire voting process was conducted fairly.
Your criterion is bullshit.
.
Last edited:
This sounds like a concession re Trump's failing legal challenges.
Also, federal courts are repeatedly tossing Trump's challenges too.
Also, while the constitution may grant authority to count votes to the legislative bodies, those legislative bodies have set up processes to handle the matter and those processes have indicated Biden is the winner by a whopping 6,000,000+ votes.
So...
I don't think Biden won the popular vote at all. You can see it in the fact of how much fraud was committed after the cheaters could determine how much Trump advantage they had to overcome. That crap didn't kick in until after 2 am, and it happened everywhere it happened at the same time. If 2016 taught you idiots anything it should have taught you that aggregate presidential vote counts don't mean anything anyway. I guess that concept is just too hard for mental midgets to understand.
To date the Trump legal team has lost one court challenge, the one in Penn. There have been other challenges tossed out where courts have failed to do their duty. Collect any Trump challenges over the next two weeks. You'll find them in front of the SCOTUS.
.
your dumbest reply yet.You mean like Democrats did in 2016?
Which candidates did the seven "faithless" electors support?
This year saw the greatest number of "faithless" electors in history. More of them were untrue to Hillary Clinton than to Donald Trump
.
Conservatives could lose in front of SCOTUS. SCOTUS would be wrong, but it could happen. If it does happen it could be reversed in congress. If all of these bodies fail to recognize that Trump actually won the election what are the chances that conservatives will do what leftists started attempting in 2017 when there was no question of who won, to burn America to the ground?
.
Conservatives could lose in front of SCOTUS. SCOTUS would be wrong, but it could happen. If it does happen it could be reversed in congress. If all of these bodies fail to recognize that Trump actually won the election what are the chances that conservatives will do what leftists started attempting in 2017 when there was no question of who won, to burn America to the ground?
.
There was no wide spread election fraud . None at all. Its all bullshit just like every other word that comes out of this administrations mouth.
Trump won because a lot of people on the left hated Hillary and didn't vote for her.
Trump pissed enough people off that they all came out and voted this time and he lost.
Country is divided as ever but this wasn't fraud. There has been zero evidence and every case has been thrown out.
Trump won because a lot of people on the left hated Hillary and didn't vote for her.
Trump pissed enough people off that they all came out and voted this time and he lost.
Country is divided as ever but this wasn't fraud. There has been zero evidence and every case has been thrown out.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants expedited review for Team Trump’s appeal from Pennsylvania.
.
Name another case, any other case from team Trump, which has been thrown out of court besides the Penn. case. You don't even have to name all of the casees you're trying to claim.
I'll be waiting.
.
Do tell. Describe one case you think will make it to the SCOTUS and explain how a ruling in Trumps favor will change the outcome of the election.
Trumby’s legal team aren’t even pursuing a SCOTUS case at this point, so how are any of these cases going to make it there?