REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I think they're going to do another cram job to try to wallpaper-over the previous 24 months and cement a permanent revenue stream for Pfizer and Moderna. I've been saying this for 24 months.And get thisguys!
fda is likely to approve the new booster without data from a human trial showing the shots were safe and efficacious in humans.
we’ve now grouped Covid vaccines in with flu vaccines.
IMHO, comparing to flu isn’t reasonable or technically sound.
this should help them on that...I think they're going to do another cram job to try to wallpaper-over the previous 24 months and cement a permanent revenue stream for Pfizer and Moderna
This is one of the reasons the Silent Exit is real.this should help them on that...
2270.
(a) It shall constitute unprofessional conduct for a physician and surgeon to disseminate misinformation or disinformation related to COVID-19, including false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) “Board” means the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, as applicable.
(2) “Disinformation” means misinformation that the licensee deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.
(3) “Disseminate” means the conveyance of information from the licensee to a patient under the licensee’s care in the form of treatment or advice.
(4) “Misinformation” means false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensusto an extent where its dissemination constitutes gross negligence by the licensee.contrary to the standard of care.
(5) “Physician and surgeon” means a person licensed by the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section
They are hiding that data because it's all part of the great Conspiracy of the Liberal Elite against us.I think they're going to do another cram job to try to wallpaper-over the previous 24 months and cement a permanent revenue stream for Pfizer and Moderna. I've been saying this for 24 months.
It's now obvious the previous mRNA trials had data integrity issues because of all the adverse events people have had. These showed up in the Phase II trials but mysteriously disappeared in the Phase III trials. I also found it strange that every vaccine created under the Warp Speed program had the same vaccine efficacy (VE) - 95%, that didn't materialize in the real world. These things have caused suspicion among a large segment of the population which never got a booster even if they got the original series. An equally-large segment of the segment of the population is going to respond like Reply Guy, "Welp, there's precedent for this and the government is looking out for me so I'm going to get the new shot."
You said it, not me. If that's what you want to think rather than that big pharmaceutical companies were in a race to be first to market for a recurring revenue stream, it's on you.They are hiding that data because it's all part of the great Conspiracy of the Liberal Elite against us.
do you know anything about the source that makes this more reliable than the average source that msm uses for their stories?You said it, not me. If that's what you want to think rather than that big pharmaceutical companies were in a race to be first to market for a recurring revenue stream, it's on you.
I've posted receipts like this all over this thread.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...www.bmj.com
got only one line. It seems like the most egregious issue in the articleAn FDA review memorandum released in August this year states that across the full trial swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected cases of symptomatic covid-19.)
Taken alone, her testimony is worthless and I agree about it not being enough to trash a trial. Adding it together with the stories of bad reactions on here, from family, from the consistent goalpost shifting and story changing by public health officials, it sounds a lot more credible. Then there was Pfizer's refusal to release raw data, the shrinking vaccine trials for younger age groups (Maddie De Garay's adverse event was thrown out of the data), then came the boosters, which I think lacked RCTs altogether. I noticed many of the doctors that promoted the initial wave of vaccines wouldn't promote the boosters. Gruber and Krause at the FDA resigned over this. Paul Offit voted against them at VRPBAC. Finally, mouse shots.do you know anything about the source that makes this more reliable than the average source that msm uses for their stories?
edit: I read it
it sounded like a lot of process error
interesting that this
got only one line. It seems like the most egregious issue in the article
but maybe 477 out of 44,000 isn’t a big enough deal to trash a trial?
and the company described in this trial did 1000 patients in. Locations
out of 44,000 across 153 locations
im not questioning the source at this point
im just not sure it’s an indicator of a bad trial
maybe it is. I don’t know
maybe operation warp speed was too much warp for clinical trials
the article is from November 2021. I wonder if any more investigation was done
The Trump Vaccine is the hight of the Liberal plot.They are hiding that data because it's all part of the great Conspiracy of the Liberal Elite against us.
how about moderna and J&J?You said it, not me. If that's what you want to think rather than that big pharmaceutical companies were in a race to be first to market for a recurring revenue stream, it's on you.
I've posted receipts like this all over this thread.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...www.bmj.com
They are hiding that data because it's all part of the great Conspiracy of the Liberal Elite against us.
Of course! It was a brilliant plan, and they would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those meddling kids and their dog.The Trump Vaccine is the hight of the Liberal plot.
My daughter is having an echocardiogram done as I type. Hopefully there isn’t permanent damage.@Sharky
Frequently Asked Questions | HRSA
Frequently asked questions about HRSA’s Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)www.hrsa.gov
So the echo showed no heart damage. At this point the thinking is long COVID induced by the vaccine/booster. She has frequent palpitations, sudden spikes in heart rate, and breathing problems. Anxiety attacks as well, but I’m hoping those are the result of fear re the above symptoms.My daughter is having an echocardiogram done as I type. Hopefully there isn’t permanent damage.
You have to file for that government compensation program within a year.So the echo showed no heart damage. At this point the thinking is long COVID induced by the vaccine/booster. She has frequent palpitations, sudden spikes in heart rate, and breathing problems. Anxiety attacks as well, but I’m hoping those are the result of fear re the above symptoms.
The course of action seems to be nutritional supplements and time. And hope it goes away. I believe the last shot was 5-6 months ago. All the symptoms commenced two days after the booster.
The human body has an amazing capacity to heal itself. I'm betting on her FTW!The course of action seems to be nutritional supplements and time. And hope it goes away.
how Is it possible to induce long covid if there’s no live virus in the mRNA vaccine? Did she have the other one? Maybe it’s long Covid caused by Covid?So the echo showed no heart damage. At this point the thinking is long COVID induced by the vaccine/booster. She has frequent palpitations, sudden spikes in heart rate, and breathing problems. Anxiety attacks as well, but I’m hoping those are the result of fear re the above symptoms.
The course of action seems to be nutritional supplements and time. And hope it goes away. I believe the last shot was 5-6 months ago. All the symptoms commenced two days after the booster.