unconstitutional, right?why would guns not be allowed in courtrooms? Disallowing them would be unconstitutional
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
unconstitutional, right?why would guns not be allowed in courtrooms? Disallowing them would be unconstitutional
Doesn’t matter. Need isn’t a prerequisite.It doesn't depend, nobody needs guns.
I have no such scenario in my head that ends with me shooting someone.I keep asking gun turds how they imagine these fantasy scenarios where they use guns for self defense. Like, somebody points the gun at you and asks you to give them your shitty wallet with $40 in it and you pull your gun out and pew pew pew shoot them dead?
Is that how it's supposed to work?
You realize that this ruling has no affect on carry restrictions at courtrooms, etc.?And no I haven't been sleeping, striking the NYC gun law is the dumbest thing that could possibly happen. I mean, what could possibly go wrong when people start carrying guns in courtrooms, schools, baseball games and bars?
Our holding decides nothing about who may lawfully possess a firearm or the requirements that must be met to buy a gun. Nor does it decide anything about the kinds of weapons that people may possess. Nor have we disturbed anything that we said in Heller or McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010), about re- strictions that may be imposed on the possession or carry- ing of guns.
There is no law anywhere in this country, proposed or in effect, that would restrict a police officer from carrying a gun off duty.HERES YOUR GOOD GUY WITH A GUN
French and his parents, Russell and Paola French, were shopping at the Costco store when the 32-year-old struck or shoved Sanchez from behind without warning while they were waiting at a sausage sample table, authorities said.
Sanchez, who was holding his toddler son in his arms, was knocked to the ground. He took out his gun and fired several times, killing French and injuring his parents.
French's parents said their son had been diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Sanchez was fired from the LAPD last year after the city's civilian Board of Police Commissioners determined that French's conduct did not present an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury - meaning that the use of lethal force was not "objectively reasonable."
The Riverside County district attorney declined to charge Sanchez criminally when a grand jury didn't indict him. However, the state attorney general charged him with voluntary manslaughter and assault with a semiautomatic firearm.
He is awaiting trial.
Open carry everywhere, but if you brandish one at somebody, minimum 10 years, no parole. Use one in a crime, minimum 25 to life.any and all firearm restrictions are unconstitutional
is that federal law?Open carry everywhere, but if you brandish one at somebody, minimum 10 years, no parole. Use one in a crime, minimum 25 to life.
Good, I'm glad we agree that gun culture insanity is just a cosplay hobby and not a right.Doesn’t matter. Need isn’t a prerequisite.
I have no such scenario in my head that ends with me shooting someone.
You realize that this ruling has no affect on carry restrictions at courtrooms, etc.?
Maybe you didn’t realize that.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
psychomartyrs everywhereOpen carry everywhere, but if you brandish one at somebody, minimum 10 years, no parole. Use one in a crime, minimum 25 to life.
Now you’re getting itany and all firearm restrictions are unconstitutional
I’m not a fan of open carry. The sight of guns makes a lot of people uncomfortable and knowingly making people uncomfortable with a potentially deadly weapon on your hip is just rude.Open carry everywhere, but if you brandish one at somebody, minimum 10 years, no parole. Use one in a crime, minimum 25 to life.
MASA
Not a fan?I’m not a fan of open carry. The sight of guns makes a lot of people uncomfortable and knowingly making people uncomfortable with a potentially deadly weapon on your hip is just rude.
That being said, states can get around the issue of “shall issue” concealed carry by outlawing concealed carry all together and allowing open carry with no special permitting to do so.
I'm good with that.......except it needs to be concealled carry.Open carry everywhere, but if you brandish one at somebody, minimum 10 years, no parole. Use one in a crime, minimum 25 to life.
Personally I'd prefer concealed carry over open carry any day of the week. I've had friends and family in law enforcement since I was a child so I've always been used to seeing relatives carry while off duty. Been plenty of times I've seen people carrying in public. Doesn't bother me.I’m not a fan of open carry. The sight of guns makes a lot of people uncomfortable and knowingly making people uncomfortable with a potentially deadly weapon on your hip is just rude.