REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
No, they are not. Death rates have been basically falling off a cliff since the beginning.New talking point? You really can't go with only the death count matters as death rates are going up in all irresponsible states.
Really? Texas and Florida just set records for deaths.No, they are not. Death rates have been basically falling off a cliff since the beginning.
At the end of the day, death count is the only thing that matters.
Not everyone but orders of magnitude more than have been testedHe's going by the fallacy that everyone has already been infected which isn't the case.
150,000 by end of next week. 300,000+ by election day and that's assuming only 1,000 dead per day. It could end being a lot more. We will learn a lot in the next 2 - 6 weeks.
Not exactly an accurate analysis.No, they are not. Death rates have been basically falling off a cliff since the beginning.
At the end of the day, death count is the only thing that matters.
Sure, if you count against total population rather than infection rate. Kento just told me we should be counting against total infectionsReally? Texas and Florida just set records for deaths.
But you know as well as I do that the death rate of those infected is an important percentage, especially as you are in the middle of it as opposed to after it has run its course. Obviously this is nowhere near as deadly as Ebola but what would you be most interested in if you had a potential of exposure: the odds of death upon contraction or how many people had it total?Not everyone but orders of magnitude more than have been tested
And this is also about comparing to previous pandemics. We don't talk about how many infected people died in the Black Plague or Spanish Flu, we talk about how many died out of the total population. This is a crucial point to show how minor this is compared to what humankind has gone through in even the recent past; worse plagues that they didn't purposefully shut down the world for
And after all, WE R ALL IN DIS 2GETHER!
The 99.96% survival rate is based on absolute ambiguous junk science.Sure, if you count against total population rather than infection rate. Kento just told me we should be counting against total infections
So if there are more deaths but orders of magnitude more have been tested you get a lower death rate.
We can play with the numbers however we want to make our points
Not worth engaging. He just keeps moving the goalposts. He won’t see it as a problem until it affects him or his life.Really? Texas and Florida just set records for deaths.
It is about how many people are dying out of the population, and that's all that matters in a pandemic situation where we're ALL basically at risk of getting thisThe 99.96% survival rate is based on absolute ambiguous junk science.
It has been affecting my life. The cure is worse than the diseaseNot worth engaging. He just keeps moving the goalposts. He won’t see it as a problem until it affects him or his life.
Cut bait.
Knowing how many people have had it total is the most important to know, and the odds of death upon contraction are heavily skewed because of how this affects different ages. Saying it has a 6% death rate overall is disingenuous when someone who is 70 has a exponentially higher risk of dying of it than someone who is 40 or someone who is 15But you know as well as I do that the death rate of those infected is an important percentage, especially as you are in the middle of it as opposed to after it has run its course. Obviously this is nowhere near as deadly as Ebola but what would you be most interested in if you had a potential of exposure: the odds of death upon contraction or how many people had it total?
But you have absolutely zero idea of how many people have actually contracted it, making any attempt at calculating a true death percentage a SWAG (at best). You go with the numbers that are actually tangible.It is about how many people are dying out of the population, and that's all that matters in a pandemic situation where we're ALL basically at risk of getting this
All Lives Matter.Knowing how many people have had it total is the most important to know, and the odds of death upon contraction are heavily skewed because of how this affects different ages. Saying it has a 6% death rate overall is disingenuous when someone who is 70 has a exponentially higher risk of dying of it than someone who is 40 or someone who is 15
*Overall death rate of those testedAll Lives Matter.
And besides, you are moving goalposts big-time there. The overall death rate right now as it stands is 8%.
When it comes to things like deciding whether to open schools or not those lives DO matter less than the lives of the youth, especially when you factor in potential of who can do what for society and the economyim not saying that we shouldn’t be looking for ways to open as much as makes sense, but the discounting of people who are old and people with high blood pressure, diabetes, or overweight, is insinuating that those lives matter less
and maybe some of those lives matter less, but many matter just as much as any other life
ignoring that makes it difficult to focus on your intended point
OK. Is that more or less statistically significant than an overall death rate based on some amorphous number that anyone can make up?*Overall death rate of those tested
The lazy eye'd White Boy and Public Enemy T-shirt really make a statement.