Quadrant Magazine
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may
mediabiasfactcheck.com
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Trump says Dominion software deleted 2.7 million Trump votes and handed another 500,000 to Biden
- Thread starter Mike_Jones
- Start date
mediabiasfactcheck.com
The irony is too much.
You looked at the photo and you know exactly what happened?
Because an Ozzie conspiracy website, who you seeked in order to confirm what you want to believe, told you so?
But you choose to ignore what actually happened:
"The Michigan lawsuit, brought by two Republican poll challengers who leveled unfounded allegations of fraud -- not the campaign itself -- had also sought an independent audit of the election, which the judge also rejected.
The campaign did, however, attach this entire lawsuit as evidence of fraud in its own lawsuit filed in the state this week. It is not clear how this will affect their case, which a judge has yet to hear.
Chief Judge Timothy M. Kenny described the plaintiff’s "interpretation" of events on Election Day as "incorrect and not credible."
'Not credible': Michigan court ruling another legal setback for President Trump
A judge in Michigan called a lawsuit seeking to block certification of results in Detroit "not credible."abcnews.go.com
Biden leads Trump by 148,000 votes right now, maybe if Trump toned down his racist rhetoric, black people in Detroit wouldn't be so motivated to vote that POS out.
Wait.. I though your objection was that the information came from an Australian source. I'm sorry. I forgot that your only acceptable sources were Venezuelan communists.
Okay, run then. Ignore the fact that that picture shows a Michigan vote counter from an unpacked counting room excluding observers because the room is too crowded.
.
Higher than what is the question.Gay men who come out of the closet report a higher level of happiness.
My guess it's because all the fucking they get to do.
Chicks always got to put the brakes on sex train.
They have higher rates of depression, suicide and substance abuse than the general population.
You can find dozens of sources on the subject.
Maybe I'm gay?
nevermind...
Wait, ABC is Venezuelan communists?
I didn't even know Venezuela was communist.
It's easily cross referenced with other legitimate sources, unlike your conspiracy vomit which can only be cross referenced with Dan fucking Bongino.
Is WSJ Venezuelan communist too?
Trump Campaign, Supporters Face Legal Setbacks in Michigan, Arizona, Pennsylvania Election Suits
President Trump in Rose Garden remarks appeared to recognize the possibility he might not return for a second term.
www.wsj.com
The actual lawsuit:
New York fucking Post:
Michigan judge: Claim of poll worker fraud in Trump lawsuit is ‘vague hearsay’
A Michigan judge’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by President Trump’s campaign was made public on Friday, saying a “vague and equivocal” sticky note was insufficient evidence…
nypost.com
Here's Every Trump Campaign Lawsuit Filed Since Election Day
Trump's campaign blitzed U.S. courts with new lawsuits this week. Judges have so far rejected most of them.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/tronc/5QJ52MGWL6Z43JFVRIGKEKBIWA.aspx)
Few legal wins so far as Trump’s lawyers hunt for fraud
In Michigan, Judge Cynthia Stephens dismissed one filing as “inadmissible hearsay within hearsay.”
www.chicagotribune.com
Trump is doing what he always does which is try to overwhelm the opposition with frivolous lawsuits to wear them out.
In this case, I fear it is a bridge too far. It his Little Big Horn, his Waterloo,
What works against the city to fight a zoning code or not pay a subcontractor won't work in this case.
In this case, I fear it is a bridge too far. It his Little Big Horn, his Waterloo,
What works against the city to fight a zoning code or not pay a subcontractor won't work in this case.
You're talking about gays on gay lock down, like all the right wing homos here.
Okay, faggot?
It might help if you looked it up. I'm sure gays on lock down are a factor, but the problems go well beyond that.
Depression Is Killing Gay Men
Gay men experience more depression and suicide, but help is available.
www.psychologytoday.com
Mental Health Facts for Gay Populations
Pressure to keep up: status imbalance a major factor in stress in gay men
Striking findings contained in new study may broaden appreciation of unique stressors faced by gay and bisexual men
www.theguardian.com
On and on.
Faggot.
Reality sucks, but try not to shoot the messenger?
Last edited:
Hey, man, why don't you go kill yourself?It might help if you looked it up. I'm sure gays on lock down are a factor, but the problems go well beyond that.
Depression Is Killing Gay Men
Gay men experience more depression and suicide, but help is available.
Faggot.
I just like to say that gays that are out of the closet are happy to mock all the gay lock downers here.
I don't need facts to do that.
I might have read it somewhere. It's being in the closet that depresses. Why do you think coming out is such a big deal for them?
Who knew there were so many right wing homo surfers trying to keep that beast in its cage?
This place is thick with them.
Squildy told me guys are wired to go gay to cut the population so you know it true.
Then you go girl.
Study: People Who Come Out of the Closet Are Happier and Healthier
A 15-year-old girl came out to her parents this week, by baking them a cake. According to new research, she's now less likely to be depressed, cynical, stressed, or anxious.
www.theatlantic.com
Appologies to Ifallalot
You realize that is only one of a number of factors and that does nothing to mitigate anything I linked to. Tons of the people evaluated for all those surveys were in fact out. I'm sure being out does help. Obviously, according to empirical research, not enough. Unfortunately. One of the factors cited in the above links re depression/suicide/substance abuse, etc. was discrimination within the gay community itself interestingly enough. Gays hating on gays. But if you found that article (your Atlantic piece) you know all this because you waded through tons of material indicating the community has problems.Study: People Who Come Out of the Closet Are Happier and Healthier
A 15-year-old girl came out to her parents this week, by baking them a cake. According to new research, she's now less likely to be depressed, cynical, stressed, or anxious.
Appologies to Ifallalot
Oh well.
This is the same bullshit narrative that transphobes are pushing.It might help if you looked it up. I'm sure gays on lock down are a factor, but the problems go well beyond that.
Depression Is Killing Gay Men
Gay men experience more depression and suicide, but help is available.
Mental Health Facts for Gay Populations
Pressure to keep up: status imbalance a major factor in stress in gay men
Striking findings contained in new study may broaden appreciation of unique stressors faced by gay and bisexual men
On and on.
Faggot.
Reality sucks, but try not to shoot the messenger?
Gays are crazy because being gay is a mental illness.
.
Again, in a vote count how does a candidate lose votes?
Well here's how.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examining the code, internet geeks conclude 'Trump's win was yuuuge'
.....Perhaps you saw the video of a network Election Night broadcast made by a person (not identified), also posted on The Gateway Pundit, which showed a sudden switch of votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania the night of Nov. 3. I took two screen shots from that video. Before the switch:
After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
Well, this video also intrigued "Pede," and he (or she) went to work. Pennsylvania uses Dominion voting systems, which forward their data to Edison Research, which then Javascript-encodes it and sends it on to the New York Times and the networks. So "Pede" downloaded the Edison data for Pennsylvania from the New York Times at this address and analyzed it to locate all similar vote switches, as well as for votes that just went missing. (Although I've given you the link, I wouldn't bother opening it, because it's just a big pile of Javascript code that's incomprehensible to the naked eye unless you know your Javascript.) In the Javascript code, "Pede" located the specific code that changed the voting percentages for Trump and Biden:
Even if you're not a computer programmer, you can still see that the code changed the percentages shown in my pictures from Trump 56.6%, Biden 42.0% to Trump 56.0%, Biden 42.6%. (The code that caused the switch of 19,958 votes is buried elsewhere in the Javascript code. The "votes" shown are total votes cast, including for minor parties, and are not useful information here.) The timestamp on these events is Nov. 4, 4:07 A.M. GMT (10:07 P.M. CST Nov. 3) and Nov. 4, 4:08 A.M. GMT (10:08 P.M. CST Nov. 3). The 15-minute gap before this switch showed up on the TV is likely due to a delay in updating the Pennsylvania info at the network.
Now, I know nothing about "Pede," but as you can see, the vote switch was shown on TV, and "Pede" located that percentage switch in the code, which means that "Pede" is working with real data and has the skills needed to identify the code and expose the anomalies. My experience has been that geeky internet bloggers are a hell of a lot more honest than most any politician, and I think we can safely proceed on the assumption that the research "Pede" has done is offered in good faith. (The only clue to "Pede's" identity is that "Pede" refers to the events as "Nr. 187" and "Nr. 188", using the European abbreviation for "number" instead of the American "No." which suggests that "Pede" was born or educated overseas.)
As "Pede" puts it, "I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden. 'Lost Votes' means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting."
Here are the results "Pede" found for the swing states:
Pennsylvania: Switched, 220,883; Lost Votes, 941,248
Florida: Switched, 21,422; Lost Votes, 456
Michigan: Switched, 20,213; Lost Votes, 21,882
Georgia: Switched, 17,407; Lost Votes, 33,574
Wisconsin: Switched, 2,078; Lost Votes, 3,408
North Carolina: Switched, 0; Lost Votes, 15
Also:
Arizona: Switched, 4,492; Lost Votes, 0
Minnesota: Switched, 2,766; Lost Votes, 195,650
Colorado: Switched, 1,809; Lost Votes, 0
Nevada: Switched, 0 Lost Votes, 0
Remember, these numbers are for electronic fraud, above and beyond the paper-ballot fraud also committed and which is slowly being uncovered and documented.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Again, in a vote count how does a candidate lose votes?
Well here's how.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examining the code, internet geeks conclude 'Trump's win was yuuuge'
.....Perhaps you saw the video of a network Election Night broadcast made by a person (not identified), also posted on The Gateway Pundit, which showed a sudden switch of votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania the night of Nov. 3. I took two screen shots from that video. Before the switch:
After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
Well, this video also intrigued "Pede," and he (or she) went to work. Pennsylvania uses Dominion voting systems, which forward their data to Edison Research, which then Javascript-encodes it and sends it on to the New York Times and the networks. So "Pede" downloaded the Edison data for Pennsylvania from the New York Times at this address and analyzed it to locate all similar vote switches, as well as for votes that just went missing. (Although I've given you the link, I wouldn't bother opening it, because it's just a big pile of Javascript code that's incomprehensible to the naked eye unless you know your Javascript.) In the Javascript code, "Pede" located the specific code that changed the voting percentages for Trump and Biden:
Even if you're not a computer programmer, you can still see that the code changed the percentages shown in my pictures from Trump 56.6%, Biden 42.0% to Trump 56.0%, Biden 42.6%. (The code that caused the switch of 19,958 votes is buried elsewhere in the Javascript code. The "votes" shown are total votes cast, including for minor parties, and are not useful information here.) The timestamp on these events is Nov. 4, 4:07 A.M. GMT (10:07 P.M. CST Nov. 3) and Nov. 4, 4:08 A.M. GMT (10:08 P.M. CST Nov. 3). The 15-minute gap before this switch showed up on the TV is likely due to a delay in updating the Pennsylvania info at the network.
Now, I know nothing about "Pede," but as you can see, the vote switch was shown on TV, and "Pede" located that percentage switch in the code, which means that "Pede" is working with real data and has the skills needed to identify the code and expose the anomalies. My experience has been that geeky internet bloggers are a hell of a lot more honest than most any politician, and I think we can safely proceed on the assumption that the research "Pede" has done is offered in good faith. (The only clue to "Pede's" identity is that "Pede" refers to the events as "Nr. 187" and "Nr. 188", using the European abbreviation for "number" instead of the American "No." which suggests that "Pede" was born or educated overseas.)
As "Pede" puts it, "I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden. 'Lost Votes' means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting."
Here are the results "Pede" found for the swing states:
Pennsylvania: Switched, 220,883; Lost Votes, 941,248
Florida: Switched, 21,422; Lost Votes, 456
Michigan: Switched, 20,213; Lost Votes, 21,882
Georgia: Switched, 17,407; Lost Votes, 33,574
Wisconsin: Switched, 2,078; Lost Votes, 3,408
North Carolina: Switched, 0; Lost Votes, 15
Also:
Arizona: Switched, 4,492; Lost Votes, 0
Minnesota: Switched, 2,766; Lost Votes, 195,650
Colorado: Switched, 1,809; Lost Votes, 0
Nevada: Switched, 0 Lost Votes, 0
Remember, these numbers are for electronic fraud, above and beyond the paper-ballot fraud also committed and which is slowly being uncovered and documented.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Last edited:
Because of Trump's fraud?
Did fraud happen only in states Trump lost?
Why don't we recount Florida?
I bet you can't prove that there was fraud in Florida.
It’s weird what you can find with a simple google search lol. same story different geniuses.
Again, in a vote count how a candidate lose votes?
Well here's how.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examining the code, internet geeks conclude 'Trump's win was yuuuge'
.....Perhaps you saw the video of a network Election Night broadcast made by a person (not identified), also posted on The Gateway Pundit, which showed a sudden switch of votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania the night of Nov. 3. I took two screen shots from that video. Before the switch:
After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
Well, this video also intrigued "Pede," and he (or she) went to work. Pennsylvania uses Dominion voting systems, which forward their data to Edison Research, which then Javascript-encodes it and sends it on to the New York Times and the networks. So "Pede" downloaded the Edison data for Pennsylvania from the New York Times at this address and analyzed it to locate all similar vote switches, as well as for votes that just went missing. (Although I've given you the link, I wouldn't bother opening it, because it's just a big pile of Javascript code that's incomprehensible to the naked eye unless you know your Javascript.) In the Javascript code, "Pede" located the specific code that changed the voting percentages for Trump and Biden:
Even if you're not a computer programmer, you can still see that the code changed the percentages shown in my pictures from Trump 56.6%, Biden 42.0% to Trump 56.0%, Biden 42.6%. (The code that caused the switch of 19,958 votes is buried elsewhere in the Javascript code. The "votes" shown are total votes cast, including for minor parties, and are not useful information here.) The timestamp on these events is Nov. 4, 4:07 A.M. GMT (10:07 P.M. CST Nov. 3) and Nov. 4, 4:08 A.M. GMT (10:08 P.M. CST Nov. 3). The 15-minute gap before this switch showed up on the TV is likely due to a delay in updating the Pennsylvania info at the network.
Now, I know nothing about "Pede," but as you can see, the vote switch was shown on TV, and "Pede" located that percentage switch in the code, which means that "Pede" is working with real data and has the skills needed to identify the code and expose the anomalies. My experience has been that geeky internet bloggers are a hell of a lot more honest than most any politician, and I think we can safely proceed on the assumption that the research "Pede" has done is offered in good faith. (The only clue to "Pede's" identity is that "Pede" refers to the events as "Nr. 187" and "Nr. 188", using the European abbreviation for "number" instead of the American "No." which suggests that "Pede" was born or educated overseas.)
As "Pede" puts it, "I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden. 'Lost Votes' means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting."
Here are the results "Pede" found for the swing states:
Pennsylvania: Switched, 220,883; Lost Votes, 941,248
Florida: Switched, 21,422; Lost Votes, 456
Michigan: Switched, 20,213; Lost Votes, 21,882
Georgia: Switched, 17,407; Lost Votes, 33,574
Wisconsin: Switched, 2,078; Lost Votes, 3,408
North Carolina: Switched, 0; Lost Votes, 15
Also:
Arizona: Switched, 4,492; Lost Votes, 0
Minnesota: Switched, 2,766; Lost Votes, 195,650
Colorado: Switched, 1,809; Lost Votes, 0
Nevada: Switched, 0 Lost Votes, 0
Remember, these numbers are for electronic fraud, above and beyond the paper-ballot fraud also committed and which is slowly being uncovered and documented.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
【In-depth Report】How the votes for president Trump deleted and tampered with by Dominion are counted？
The ridiculous thing is that the so-called 'mainstream media' mentioned above have ignored the facts and overwhelmingly propagated Biden's victory in this election. Now the American people are getting closer and closer to the truth, and the shadow of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) behind...
A few questions come to mind, from this thread.
1. Who is more stressed. A closeted gay, or an incel?
2. Does anybody read those long cut/ paste things by Squidley
3. Why does Squidley have 3 interchangeable accounts? If I had multiple accounts, they would talk to each other to build a storyline.
1. Who is more stressed. A closeted gay, or an incel?
2. Does anybody read those long cut/ paste things by Squidley
3. Why does Squidley have 3 interchangeable accounts? If I had multiple accounts, they would talk to each other to build a storyline.
Unlike you, I actually was banned ......Twice.
1. Once for making a poliitical post on the Surfer forum after the owner of SurferMag ......made a political post on the Surfer forum. Yes, I cited the owner's post when I posted. No, unlike you I didn't parade around bitching about it.
2. Then I got banned for taking issue when a mod claimed that the recent Surfer reorganization was needed. I said that I "suspect" that the reorganization was merely a payment for services received.
3. There is no 3. You're talking out your ass again.
Since SurferMag banned my second login about two waeeks ago I have used nothing but this one. So you're still talking out your ass.
.
OMG!
YOU CAN'T EVEN COUNT TO THREE!!!
YOU GOT BANNED TWICE, THAT'S TWO ACCOUNTS
YOUR POSTING NOW ON YOUR THIRD ACCOUNT
HI LEE FOOK!
Is there video of this cnn mishap or just convenient screen shots? Did this error show up on any other networks? Please provide more in..
Again, in a vote count how a candidate lose votes?
Well here's how.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examining the code, internet geeks conclude 'Trump's win was yuuuge'
.....Perhaps you saw the video of a network Election Night broadcast made by a person (not identified), also posted on The Gateway Pundit, which showed a sudden switch of votes from Trump to Biden in Pennsylvania the night of Nov. 3. I took two screen shots from that video. Before the switch:
After:
You can see that, almost instantly, 19,958 votes were stolen from Trump, and 19,958 votes were added to Biden's total. The timestamp on the video (not shown in my pictures) is 10:23 P.M. (CST).
Well, this video also intrigued "Pede," and he (or she) went to work. Pennsylvania uses Dominion voting systems, which forward their data to Edison Research, which then Javascript-encodes it and sends it on to the New York Times and the networks. So "Pede" downloaded the Edison data for Pennsylvania from the New York Times at this address and analyzed it to locate all similar vote switches, as well as for votes that just went missing. (Although I've given you the link, I wouldn't bother opening it, because it's just a big pile of Javascript code that's incomprehensible to the naked eye unless you know your Javascript.) In the Javascript code, "Pede" located the specific code that changed the voting percentages for Trump and Biden:
Even if you're not a computer programmer, you can still see that the code changed the percentages shown in my pictures from Trump 56.6%, Biden 42.0% to Trump 56.0%, Biden 42.6%. (The code that caused the switch of 19,958 votes is buried elsewhere in the Javascript code. The "votes" shown are total votes cast, including for minor parties, and are not useful information here.) The timestamp on these events is Nov. 4, 4:07 A.M. GMT (10:07 P.M. CST Nov. 3) and Nov. 4, 4:08 A.M. GMT (10:08 P.M. CST Nov. 3). The 15-minute gap before this switch showed up on the TV is likely due to a delay in updating the Pennsylvania info at the network.
Now, I know nothing about "Pede," but as you can see, the vote switch was shown on TV, and "Pede" located that percentage switch in the code, which means that "Pede" is working with real data and has the skills needed to identify the code and expose the anomalies. My experience has been that geeky internet bloggers are a hell of a lot more honest than most any politician, and I think we can safely proceed on the assumption that the research "Pede" has done is offered in good faith. (The only clue to "Pede's" identity is that "Pede" refers to the events as "Nr. 187" and "Nr. 188", using the European abbreviation for "number" instead of the American "No." which suggests that "Pede" was born or educated overseas.)
As "Pede" puts it, "I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden. 'Lost Votes' means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting."
Here are the results "Pede" found for the swing states:
Pennsylvania: Switched, 220,883; Lost Votes, 941,248
Florida: Switched, 21,422; Lost Votes, 456
Michigan: Switched, 20,213; Lost Votes, 21,882
Georgia: Switched, 17,407; Lost Votes, 33,574
Wisconsin: Switched, 2,078; Lost Votes, 3,408
North Carolina: Switched, 0; Lost Votes, 15
Also:
Arizona: Switched, 4,492; Lost Votes, 0
Minnesota: Switched, 2,766; Lost Votes, 195,650
Colorado: Switched, 1,809; Lost Votes, 0
Nevada: Switched, 0 Lost Votes, 0
Remember, these numbers are for electronic fraud, above and beyond the paper-ballot fraud also committed and which is slowly being uncovered and documented.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.