https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/trump-campaign-defends-wikileaks-use-hacked-dnc-emails/572587/
Wait, did they just admit to collusion with Russia?
Wait, did they just admit to collusion with Russia?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Receiving stolen information probably a crime, no? If the above becomes the law on stuff like this, all bets are off when it comes to hacking campaigns. Trump aside, I don't think that's a good precedent.GromsDad said:Is this statement wrong? "The First Amendment protects the campaign’s “right to disclose information—even stolen information—so long as (1) the speaker did not participate in the theft and (2) the information deals with matters of public concern.”
Were not you against Kavanaugh getting confirmed, the joy of librul women's change your mind?ifallalot said:
A loss on Kavanaugh, so back to COLLUSHUN
I don't know.GromsDad said:Did they really "recieve stolen information" or did they simply use information made public by wikileaks, but largely ignored by the main stream media, to their advantage. I think you know it was the latter. Trump was doing the media's job for them and forcing them to report stuff that they were trying to bury because it was damaging to Obama/Clinton/Democrats.
you're apparently unaware of the text message exchange between Wikileaks and Don Jr.GromsDad said:Did they really "recieve stolen information" or did they simply use information made public by wikileaks, but largely ignored by the main stream media, to their advantage. I think you know it was the latter. Trump was doing the media's job for them and forcing them to report stuff that they were trying to bury because it was damaging to Obama/Clinton/Democrats.
You don't know because the only news you were probably paying attention to at the time was CNN and MSNBC. If you had been paying better attention you would have seen this stuff on the web long before Trump brought it up or your news sources were dragged kicking and screaming into giving these things coverage.StuAzole said:I don't know.GromsDad said:Did they really "recieve stolen information" or did they simply use information made public by wikileaks, but largely ignored by the main stream media, to their advantage. I think you know it was the latter. Trump was doing the media's job for them and forcing them to report stuff that they were trying to bury because it was damaging to Obama/Clinton/Democrats.
I think that's what Mueller's looking at. I'm content to wait to see what he finds.
Are you suggesting the news has all the answers already? That they know what Mueller knows? OK.GromsDad said:You don't know because the only news you were probably paying attention to at the time was CNN and MSNBC. If you had been paying better attention you would have seen this stuff on the web long before Trump brought it up or your news sources were dragged kicking and screaming into giving these things coverage.StuAzole said:I don't know.GromsDad said:Did they really "recieve stolen information" or did they simply use information made public by wikileaks, but largely ignored by the main stream media, to their advantage. I think you know it was the latter. Trump was doing the media's job for them and forcing them to report stuff that they were trying to bury because it was damaging to Obama/Clinton/Democrats.
I think that's what Mueller's looking at. I'm content to wait to see what he finds.
I was against his confirmation, doesn’t mean i can’t point out standard #resist ridiculousnessmundus said:Were not you against Kavanaugh getting confirmed, the joy of librul women's change your mind?ifallalot said:
A loss on Kavanaugh, so back to COLLUSHUN
Except, it's not "back" to COLLUSHN, the COLLUSHN facts are still present.ifallalot said:I was against his confirmation, doesn’t mean i can’t point out standard #resist ridiculousnessmundus said:Were not you against Kavanaugh getting confirmed, the joy of librul women's change your mind?ifallalot said:
A loss on Kavanaugh, so back to COLLUSHUN
Do you think Kavanaugh probably jumped on little Ms.Blasey back in 1982 or whenever? Held his hand over her mouth and groped her body? This is a yes or no question.ifallalot said:I was against his confirmation, doesn’t mean i can’t point out standard #resist ridiculousnessmundus said:Were not you against Kavanaugh getting confirmed, the joy of librul women's change your mind?ifallalot said:
A loss on Kavanaugh, so back to COLLUSHUN