I'll take your word as an expert on circle jerks. Your opinion on quality anything is suspect at best.Awards are always self-congratulatory. It is one industry participating in a vast circle jerk upon itself.
Quality journalism?
Putin??
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Trumby commits a new impeachable offense via twitter.
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
YEah, that's not "spelled out in the Constitution"
Impeachment as a tantruming opposition tactic is a bad precedent
So where do you find your daily outrage of the day, you sure trust that source.None. Only a fool trusts any source.
And if you trust the Atlantic?
Then Schiff is guilty of the above for allowing the whistleblowers name to be published UNREDACTED in the William Taylor deposition and Q/A session Oct. 22.
It's right there for all to see.
When it comes to political topics, I don't automatically trust any of them. Not one. AFAICT they're all taking sides.
True.
But this is PROFOUNDLY illegal. That’s, like, extra illegal.
Super duper illegal.
So.....let’s say Trumby did actually expose the whistle blower and he decides to be “out” and decides to testify.
How does this help Trumby?
How does this help Trumby?
Maybe Trump thinks he can use the complainants motivations and his interactions with Schiff to discredit the process. After all, aren't you one of the people who is saying above that impeachment is a political process and not necessarily a strictly criminal justice process?
So let's say the WB testifies. That could inspire more people with direct knowledge to testify. How does this help Trumby's case?