I wouldnt vote for her on either side. Shes cooked.If HRC ran as a Republican you’d vote for her?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I wouldnt vote for her on either side. Shes cooked.If HRC ran as a Republican you’d vote for her?
If HRC ran as a Republican against Biden I would vote for herIf HRC ran as a Republican you’d vote for her?
Whoa, do you have the inside scoop?If HRC ran as a Republican you’d vote for her?
absolutely! - when appropriateso you seem to be saying yes, we should investigate and indict government officials when appropriate. Got it.
So your only argument is to attack me... you're still losingThat's another strawman.
You must do without realizing.
It's seems you are another for whom trump can do no wrong.
This is the mark of the trump minion.
yes and there often needs to be some investigation to determine if an investigation is appropriateabsolutely! - when appropriate
So there are no facts in this thread for you to sink your teeth in? Just name calling?When all you can do is call names everyone knows you are losing.
It's not a red pill it's just hard for you to hear the truth because nobody wants to tell it
Which situation? I'm talking about attacks on Trump.All that is sufficiently vague so as to be absolutely meaningless in this context. You refuse to address the specifics of this actual situation because you can't - you're therefore reduced to making dramatic statements about indefinable entities and imaginary enemies that neither be proven or denied. You cannot process the current reality so you lash out with childish nonsense. Why are you even commenting when you have nothing of substance to say?
I'm responding to name calling. Shall we discuss something else besides me? Great!So there are no facts in this thread for you to sink your teeth in? Just name calling?
Confirmation bias is a hella drug.
Losing what?So your only argument is to attack me... you're still losing
Well, there are actual facts in this thread.I'm responding to name calling. Shall we discuss something else besides me? Great!
Again, it’s unlawful to discuss the details of a sealed warrant. Trump has a copy, he can release it, but the Feds can’t talk.Then there's a good chance it will give Trump a boost in 2024.
Citing the significance of a former prez's home being raided by the FBI, multiple news orgs requested the affidavit that led to the search warrant - all were denied.
The Justice Department said in its filing that disclosing the affidavit details "at this juncture" would "cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation."
"The redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest," the Justice Department stated.
"Not since the Nixon Administration has a President been the subject of such a dramatic and public criminal process," the outlets said in the filing, adding that the outlets are "attempting to shed light on the federal government's unprecedented actions and motivations."
"Here, there could not be a more 'historically significant event' than an FBI raid of a former President's home for the alleged removal of national security records after leaving office," the outlets said.
DOJ opposes making details public in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit
The Justice Department is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument that investigators made to a federal magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate last week.edition.cnn.com
So as I predicted -
They're not going to be able to tell us why they raided El Trumpo's palace.
It's a sekrit.
For our own protection.
The men and women at the FBI are good and loyal patriots. CIA too.
They have our best interests in mind.
If they keep the public in the dark about why the FBI raided the home of a former prez and assumed presidential candidate it's for our own good.
you left out this situation: by all accounts, he took/stored/mishandled classified, top-secret docs illegally. making dramatic statements about indefinable entities and imaginary accomplishments and irrelevant talking points does not change that or mitigate it in any way. try to keep up.Which situation? I'm talking about attacks on Trump.
He called out the MSM repeatedly and did not back down
He questioned every aspect of a bloated government
He was spied on (Carter Page), lies to FISA court by the FBI, e-mails changed by the FBI
He went after NATO, nuclear deals w the death to America crowd, signed peace agreements in the middle east, lowered taxes, increased employment (especially minorities)
So he is attacked repeatedly and endlessly since he threatens the status quo and the good ole boys club
Look to see who gains by attacking him and maybe you'll gain some understanding
The Durham investigation has been going on for considerably longer than Mueller, and instead of having ten separate instances of obstruction of justice, they have one word in one email and jack sh!t else.you left out this situation: by all accounts, he took/stored/mishandled classified, top-secret docs illegally. making dramatic statements about indefinable entities and imaginary accomplishments and irrelevant talking points does not change that or mitigate it in any way. try to keep up.
Let’s see that Trump tramp stamp; otherwise you’re just blowin hot air.Which situation? I'm talking about attacks on Trump.
He called out the MSM repeatedly and did not back down
He questioned every aspect of a bloated government
He was spied on (Carter Page), lies to FISA court by the FBI, e-mails changed by the FBI
He went after NATO, nuclear deals w the death to America crowd, signed peace agreements in the middle east, lowered taxes, increased employment (especially minorities)
So he is attacked repeatedly and endlessly since he threatens the status quo and the good ole boys club
Look to see who gains by attacking him and maybe you'll gain some understanding