you know this setup is going to go bonkersJust because it's not what you wanted to buy, we all know that Racer's performer rears will be the magic set up.
the Reforrest special
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
you know this setup is going to go bonkersJust because it's not what you wanted to buy, we all know that Racer's performer rears will be the magic set up.
I forgot that you have fcs2. In fcs2, i think they're called split keels? now that @Retropete has confirmed they work well, maybe i'll give them a go as rear fins next time I ride a quad.@silentbutdeadly I've definitely been "racer'd"
@HSY I dont have a set of controllers but ill look into those. I have the Carver rears, K2.1 rears, and now the PERFORMER rears. lol.
@JDJ nice find! Thanks. I'll look into those too.
Sounds kinky. Ever thought about forgetting the tiny nubster and riding a 5'8 with a bit of girth?I'm loving mine as with the Stilleto quads and a tiny nubster.
You check out the new revo podcast ? Dude is running a asym fin set upI'm loving mine as with the Stilleto quads and a tiny nubster.
I haven't - whats the fin set up? What podcast?You check out the new revo podcast ? Dude is running a asym fin set up
I haven't - whats the fin set up? What podcast?
Did you actually try that? If so, what was it like?You read my mind...
Gonna do some testing this week/weekend
View attachment 132617
I hope the leash string police dont cite me for this one.
I didnt like it at all. It was too stiff and didn't really want to turn.Did you actually try that? If so, what was it like?
It seems like the pivoty rears should be right under foot like this, though I know Tomo suggests that the hatchets go in the back.
I can’t help wondering if that bottom turn spring on the Revo is produced more by the vee quad concave or the “parabolic flex”.This is from the RUSTY article (below)
Pointbreak board: double barrel (domed) vee.
Off to the tropics? Shallow, clean, double concaves are usually a good solution. Still get the lift and the bite from the concaves but with some directional enhancement from the spine of the vee. High-speed rail-to-rail transitions are made easier because of the lateral break in the bottom.
MY OPINION:
@sdsrfr. I've never ridden a Vee and this is good confirmation about what I was feeling.
The obvious difference that I can see from the Double Barrel Vee above and Tomo's Vee Quad Concave is the additional concaves running through the center. I think its the same concept of getting quick directional changes, but with the additional concaves on outter part of the board you get more grip and speed once its tipped over on the Vee and you engage the rail.
The bottom turns on the Revo are pretty insane! The first time I rode it, it shot me straight up the face like a rocket. I couldnt even bring it back for a turn. It just shot me straight out the back. I was blown away! ...And all i could do was grin and say to myself "this is the sh!t!"
I firmly believe its the Vee. The flex is great too and I think that helps keep speed through turns, but the sharp directional change is definitely the VQC. Its such a sick board.I can’t help wondering if that bottom turn spring on the Revo is produced more by the vee quad concave or the “parabolic flex”.
My Revo is same size and volume as the Cymatic i rode.How'd you guys size your Revos? Looks like a fun shape, but being a snub nosed Tomo makes me hesitant to use usual length/volume benchmarks.
Guess you're right. I keep looking at it and trying to figure out where the magic comes from, it doesn't seem that unusual a design, though the VQC isn't that obvious unless you look at it right or run your hand along the length of the bottom spine.I firmly believe its the Vee. The flex is great too and I think that helps keep speed through turns, but the sharp directional change is definitely the VQC. Its such a sick board.
I intentionally sized it a few liters more than usual for a SB (I have a 5'6 cymatic that feels right, for instance), figuring that it might give it a slightly better range, from groveling to larger waves. It's so lively and easy to surf that I doubt the extra makes much of a difference at all in performance. Also, the bump in volume, low rocker, and maybe the parallel outline, make it an unusually strong paddler/wave catcher for a 5'8 (33L). I'm 5'11 and 160 lbs.How'd you guys size your Revos? Looks like a fun shape, but being a snub nosed Tomo makes me hesitant to use usual length/volume benchmarks.