REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sidebar Sidebar

Tim Stamps - Shaper of the Year

Aruka

Aruka

Tom Curren status
Feb 23, 2010
12,165
23,109
113
PNW
silentbutdeadly said:
interestjng. I would think you’d want more rake with fins up there. Shows you what I know
Click to expand...
10.5 seems fairly far back for a 7-0.

Ive had longer twins with boxes up at like 11+

I think the 7-2 AG i have is further up than 11 which Allan said was good position for either keels or uprights. Ive ran both with good results although with longer twins like that I generally prefer uprights just to loosen it up. As far as keels i liked the nvs docs because they are smallish. Piggybacks would be good too i bet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDJ
silentbutdeadly

silentbutdeadly

Duke status
Sep 26, 2005
33,770
23,617
113
Tower 13
Aruka said:
10.5 seems fairly far back for a 7-0.

Ive had longer twins with boxes up at like 11+

I think the 7-2 AG i have is further up than 11 which Allan said was good position for either keels or uprights. Ive ran both with good results although with longer twins like that I generally prefer uprights just to loosen it up. As far as keels i liked the nvs docs because they are smallish. Piggybacks would be good too i bet.
Click to expand...
Ah ok. That Splains it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aruka
ChaseTMP

ChaseTMP

Michael Peterson status
Apr 6, 2014
1,780
3,203
113
S. Redondo
I hope Shapers' fiberglass offerings have better QC than the Corelight Asher Pacey set I got a few years ago. I had to do a lot of work on them to get out weird lumps n' bumps.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: JDJ
Aruka

Aruka

Tom Curren status
Feb 23, 2010
12,165
23,109
113
PNW
ChaseTMP said:
I hope Shapers' fiberglass offerings have better QC than the Corelight Asher Pacey set I got a few years ago. I had to do a lot of work on them to get out weird lumps n' bumps.
Click to expand...
The ones i got are good. I got the twuster and album AR set at the same time. Both fine.

I had a set of shapers honeycomb quads prob like 10 years ago that fit kinda loose in the boxes. At the time i was getting them wholesale and it was just that one set but still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaseTMP
L

Lowqi2

OTF status
Mar 17, 2013
256
394
63
yo havoc. Look into the Captain fin company Panda twin set for twin plus trailer and BMT as twin. - I think you’ll like them
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Havoc
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Share this page
Top Bottom