REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I thought it said you could charge sick people more than 3x what you charge healthy people, community provision or whatever?GDaddy said:It doesn't address costs so it's all-but-meaningless to everyone who is not among the takers.
Too much sense.Autoprax said:I thought insurance was about spreading risk?
Wouldn't it be better to take the profit motive out of it?
Why not just pay insurance companies to run a single payer. They make money running it. Not not paying for sick people.
Should we do that for food? Water? Housing? Why start with healthcare, which doesn't even scratch the surface of basic human necessitates?Autoprax said:I thought insurance was about spreading risk?
Wouldn't it be better to take the profit motive out of it?
Why not just pay insurance companies to run a single payer. They make money running it. Not not paying for sick people.
It shows how if you build a straw man, no matter how ridiculous, the democrats will come running to defend it.Gnudz said:I like that it shows what Republicans really stand for: party loyalty, meanness, greed, and stupidity.
No.VonMeister said:Should we do that for food?Autoprax said:I thought insurance was about spreading risk?
Wouldn't it be better to take the profit motive out of it?
Why not just pay insurance companies to run a single payer. They make money running it. Not not paying for sick people.
it's RyanCare, TrumpCare, GOPCare. whatever stupid name people need to categorize it to satisfy they're narrow view of the world, it's now the GOP's albatross. better or worse, they've now expected responsibility.VeniceSrfr said:that its not Obamacare
cause a company like Aetna can't afford to cut into it's $2.9 billion annual profits. how's the CEO going to live if he's $17 million annual compensation is hurt from giving a bunch of freeloaders more health coverage driving profits down.Gnudz said:I like that it shows what Republicans really stand for: party loyalty, meanness, greed, and stupidity.
I know. I thought this too. IF you really want to do health care you kind of have to make people do stuff they don't want to do.VonMeister said:Should we do that for food? Water? Housing? Why start with healthcare, which doesn't even scratch the surface of basic human necessitates?Autoprax said:I thought insurance was about spreading risk?
Wouldn't it be better to take the profit motive out of it?
Why not just pay insurance companies to run a single payer. They make money running it. Not not paying for sick people.
Is it because of money and political donations?
You're having trouble functioning lately. Your arguments have gone from dumb to silly.FecalFace said:No.VonMeister said:Should we do that for food?Autoprax said:I thought insurance was about spreading risk?
Wouldn't it be better to take the profit motive out of it?
Why not just pay insurance companies to run a single payer. They make money running it. Not not paying for sick people.
Because BigMac costs $1 and heart surgery costs $200,000.
Any other stupid questions?
We already do.VonMeister said:Should we do that for food? Water? Housing? Why start with healthcare, which doesn't even scratch the surface of basic human necessitates?