Flat-Earthers Have a Wild New Theory About Forests
What it means to believe that "real" trees no longer exist
www.theatlantic.com
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
View attachment 119766
This comes from a professor of medicine at the University of Colorado named Nick Brandenhoff. IDK where he got his data but it looks legit.
What’s there to spin? The data is right there, this is only dangerous to the elderlycan't wait to see how the usual suspects spin this
Would you say, based on the data, that it's more dangerous to be 80+ and fully vaccinated or 50-64 and unvaccinated?What’s there to spin? The data is right there, this is only dangerous to the elderly
I'd say regardless of vaccination status its more dangerous to leave your house than worry about something that's killing less than 100 per 100,000 among people who are older than the average life expectancyWould you say, based on the data, that it's more dangerous to be 80+ and fully vaccinated or 50-64 and unvaccinated?
Would you say, based on the data, that it's more dangerous to be 65-79 and fully vaccinated or 30-49 and unvaccinated?
I think people in the 30-49 cohort might consider the vaccine so they have better odds of surviving a potential Covid infection than fully vaccinated 65-79 year olds. Based on the unspun data. From Dr. "Lets go" Brandenhoff.I'd say regardless of vaccination status its more dangerous to leave your house than worry about something that's killing less than 100 per 100,000 among people who are older than the average life expectancy
I'd also say there's virtually no reason for anyone under 50 to get a vaccine
You're talking about less than 10 per 100,000I think people in the 30-49 cohort might consider the vaccine so they have better odds of surviving a potential Covid infection than fully vaccinated 65-79 year olds. Based on the unspun data. From Dr. "Lets go" Brandenhoff.
Yeah but I still wear my seatbelt and use my signal lights.You're talking about less than 10 per 100,000
Driving is more dangerous
Fatality Facts 2021: State by state
A summary of fatality statistics about state by state compiled by IIHS from 2021 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data.www.iihs.org
No one's denying thatYeah but I still wear my seatbelt and use my signal lights.
You'll also note DC and Massachusetts did the best and Wyoming and South Carolina did the worst - no surprises there.
Kind of like it's no surprise the vaccine reduces one's chances of dying of Covid!
It's easy for me to understand. My point is the vaccine reduces the risk. There seems to be quite a bit of denying that.No one's denying that
However we're talking about chances that were already minuscule
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
I'm pretty certain that I could weather the respiratory distress, but the potential loss of taste and smell is not something I want to riskI think people in the 30-49 cohort might consider the vaccine so they have better odds of surviving a potential Covid infection than fully vaccinated 65-79 year olds. Based on the unspun data. From Dr. "Lets go" Brandenhoff.
They run along the same Dopey characters within their respective culture as ISIS does with Muslims.making broad statements using absolutes is super fun!
all people who have associated with the proud boy organization are incel dupes
see....that's fun!
He went to the Dentists Office and spent some time in the waiting roomAnybody who goes from the left of Antifa to proud bois in their mid 30's does not have a stable mental state.
I need to dietI'm pretty certain that I could weather the respiratory distress, but the potential loss of taste and smell is not something I want to risk
The basically nonexistent riskIt's easy for me to understand. My point is the vaccine reduces the risk. There seems to be quite a bit of denying that.
Yes - post-Laffer there is a negative risk a Republican president will cut the deficit. The opposite happening is guaranteed.Can you get into negative risk?
FIFYYou're talking about less than 10 per 100,000
Driving is an order of magnitude less dangerous
Fatality Facts 2021: State by state
A summary of fatality statistics about state by state compiled by IIHS from 2021 Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data.www.iihs.org