REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Really? I know Rusty has been using CAD for a long time now and assumed consistency between shapers there would be really good.casa_mugrienta said:When you have several guys shaping under a label I feel you never know what to expect.
I'm saying 6 different shapers working under the Rusty label92122 said:Really? I know Rusty has been using CAD for a long time now and assumed consistency between shapers there would be really good.casa_mugrienta said:When you have several guys shaping under a label I feel you never know what to expect.
I've said glowing things as well as negative.Greg Griffin said:Wish Rusty would respond to your negative comments
These guys have their own models under the label:I doubt he has 6 ghost shapers
And I’m saying all of them should be shaping each model to the developed and tested specs that the team agrees to standardize on, No?casa_mugrienta said:I'm saying 6 different shapers working under the Rusty label92122 said:Really? I know Rusty has been using CAD for a long time now and assumed consistency between shapers there would be really good.casa_mugrienta said:When you have several guys shaping under a label I feel you never know what to expect.
I dunno how they do it, I just know Rusty isn't the only one designing boards.92122 said:And I’m saying all of them should be shaping each model to the developed and tested specs that the team agrees to standardize on, No?casa_mugrienta said:I'm saying 6 different shapers working under the Rusty label92122 said:Really? I know Rusty has been using CAD for a long time now and assumed consistency between shapers there would be really good.casa_mugrienta said:When you have several guys shaping under a label I feel you never know what to expect.
I think Russo shaped my Chew Toy (hand written under the glass) but all the boards have “shaped by R. Preisendorfer” on the stamp graphic with the specs.
Just my personal opinion here but I’d sell that CI before it takes any more use/damage.manbearpig said:Nice reviews so far.
I really dig the HP twin so it sounds like it's up my alley.
I need to give my CI twin a session or two more, and I think this flatness is making me think too much about boards.
Fixed for ya sd101sd_101 said:Hammon has been around for a while and came up with a number of their (successful) creations. Why is it bad he shapes under Goth R(dot)?
I’m failing to understand where your complaint is coming in.
Maybe you didn’t “talk to your shaper”?
Rusty has a fantastic IG, too.
sd_101 said:Hammon has been around for a while and came up with a number of their (successful) creations. Why is it bad he shapes under R(dot)?
I’m failing to understand where your complaint is coming in.
Maybe you didn’t “talk to your shaper”?
Rusty has a fantastic IG, too.
Greg Griffin said:You sh!t on the Happy Too .
These are your posts .
Stirr that too.