How many posts do you have in this thread?
Did you say anything? No.
You are just asking stupid questions and spewing ad hominems, you haven't made a point yet. Boring AF.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
***Official United States Supreme Court Thread***
- Thread starter maybe
- Start date
Did you say anything? No.
You are just asking stupid questions and spewing ad hominems, you haven't made a point yet. Boring AF.
You made a dumb statement. I asked you to explain yourself. You can't. You seem completely ignorant on the issue.
These are all your dumbfuck posts from this thread.
You didn't say a single thing of substance.
Not a single word.
You didn't make a point or an argument.
NOTHING, just insults.
But you are strutting around like a winner. You dumbass.
You didn't say a single thing of substance.
Not a single word.
You didn't make a point or an argument.
NOTHING, just insults.
But you are strutting around like a winner. You dumbass.
There is a lot of deflection from Team Cheeto, and we are still in April. It will be truly fascinating watching the Trumpers on the erBB become completely unhinged as the election nears.
Lets try this again.
How exactly can the Supreme Court Punish women? How exactly can the Supreme Court force women to give birth. Their decision on RvW did neither of those things. RvW from the very beginning was bad law and did not follow the US Constitution. The current SC simply righted a bad decision from decades ago. If you want to be mad be mad at the SC of decades ago who got it wrong........not the court that fixed what they broke. It is 100% up to the legislatures of the individual states as per the Constitution on such matters and many others where the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
where in the constitution does it say that abortion is illegal?
What in the recent decision indicates abortion legislation is exclusively a state matter and what part of the constitution supports this?
R v W was recognized as a right under the 14th amendment, which is in the Constitution, you ding dong.
They didn't "fix what they broke", they retarded the law back to 1800s.
It's not about my feelings you fucking moron, it's about government forcefully taking control of women's bodies and life.
On the second thought, you should just stfu and go back to saying nothing.
It was much better that way.
Last edited:
On a separate SCOTUS note, I just listened to Kavanaugh questioning the Grants Pass lawyer and holy crap that woman is batshit crazy.
She would not answer the question about what would happen to the homeless after they come out from jail and into the same (probably worse) situation they've been before they were arrested.
Making these people somebody else's problem, is not a solution.
When Kavanaugh actually makes sense, you know it's bad.
She would not answer the question about what would happen to the homeless after they come out from jail and into the same (probably worse) situation they've been before they were arrested.
Making these people somebody else's problem, is not a solution.
When Kavanaugh actually makes sense, you know it's bad.
I love these questions.
You want me to explain to you Roe v Wade under 14 amendment?
The law that's been on the books for 50 years?
Until Trimp took us backwards to 1800s.
Do you know anything?
Here it is below. Please explain for us where you find abortion in there.I love these questions.
You want me to explain to you Roe v Wade under 14 amendment?
The law that's been on the books for 50 years?
Until Trimp took us backwards to 1800s.
Do you know anything?
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Where does it say that abortion should be banned?
You are still ignoring R v.W and how it came to be.
Tenth AmendmentWhere does it say that abortion should be banned?
You are still ignoring R v.W and how it came to be.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
And that was absurd. Its a states issue for the states to set their own rules. Get over it.