How many posts do you have in this thread?You seem to be completely confused about the matter.
Did you say anything? No.
You are just asking stupid questions and spewing ad hominems, you haven't made a point yet. Boring AF.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
How many posts do you have in this thread?You seem to be completely confused about the matter.
So, it's a geographic question then.No, not children, only fetuses.
They can punish women and force them to give birth.
Freeedumz.
You made a dumb statement. I asked you to explain yourself. You can't. You seem completely ignorant on the issue.How so? Please explain your logic on this one in detail.
Why do you want Cheeto in jail so badly? You must think Biden can't beat him at the ballot box without Lawfare and election interference. I'd take you more seriously if you came right out and admitted it.
Detail this for us.
Why are you calling Stu a retard? Do you always refer to the mentally and physically disabled with such vile terms?
You seem to be completely confused about the matter.
You made a dumb statement. I asked you to explain yourself. You can't. You seem completely ignorant on the issue.
These are all your dumbfuck posts from this thread.
You didn't say a single thing of substance.
Not a single word.
You didn't make a point or an argument.
NOTHING, just insults.
But you are strutting around like a winner. You dumbass.
Lets try this again.They can punish women and force them to give birth.
Freeedumz.
where in the constitution does it say that abortion is illegal?Lets try this again.
How exactly can the Supreme Court Punish women? How exactly can the Supreme Court force women to give birth. Their decision on RvW did neither of those things. RvW from the very beginning was bad law and did not follow the US Constitution. The current SC simply righted a bad decision from decades ago. If you want to be mad be mad at the SC of decades ago who got it wrong........not the court that fixed what they broke. It is 100% up to the legislatures of the individual states as per the Constitution on such matters and many others where the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
What in the recent decision indicates abortion legislation is exclusively a state matter and what part of the constitution supports this?Lets try this again.
How exactly can the Supreme Court Punish women? How exactly can the Supreme Court force women to give birth. Their decision on RvW did neither of those things. RvW from the very beginning was bad law and did not follow the US Constitution. The current SC simply righted a bad decision from decades ago. If you want to be mad be mad at the SC of decades ago who got it wrong........not the court that fixed what they broke. It is 100% up to the legislatures of the individual states as per the Constitution on such matters and many others where the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
look at this dipshit pretending to be a big boyLets try this again.
How exactly can the Supreme Court Punish women? How exactly can the Supreme Court force women to give birth. Their decision on RvW did neither of those things. RvW from the very beginning was bad law and did not follow the US Constitution. The current SC simply righted a bad decision from decades ago. If you want to be mad be mad at the SC of decades ago who got it wrong........not the court that fixed what they broke. It is 100% up to the legislatures of the individual states as per the Constitution on such matters and many others where the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
R v W was recognized as a right under the 14th amendment, which is in the Constitution, you ding dong.Lets try this again.
How exactly can the Supreme Court Punish women? How exactly can the Supreme Court force women to give birth. Their decision on RvW did neither of those things. RvW from the very beginning was bad law and did not follow the US Constitution. The current SC simply righted a bad decision from decades ago. If you want to be mad be mad at the SC of decades ago who got it wrong........not the court that fixed what they broke. It is 100% up to the legislatures of the individual states as per the Constitution on such matters and many others where the federal government has overstepped its bounds. Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
It's not about my feelings you fucking moron, it's about government forcefully taking control of women's bodies and life.Read the fukking Constitution man. Get over your feelz. Fuk your feelz.
please explain the 14th Amendment for us in the context of your remark.R v W was recognized as a right under the 14th amendment, which is in the Constitution, you ding dong.
They didn't "fix what they broke", they retarded the law back to 1800s.
It's not about my feelings you fucking moron, it's about government forcefully taking control of women's bodies and life.
On the second thought, you should just stfu and go back to saying nothing.
It was much better that way.
Do you support total Presidential immunity?please explain the 14th Amendment for us in the context of your remark.
I love these questions.please explain the 14th Amendment for us in the context of your remark.
Here it is below. Please explain for us where you find abortion in there.I love these questions.
You want me to explain to you Roe v Wade under 14 amendment?
The law that's been on the books for 50 years?
Until Trimp took us backwards to 1800s.
Do you know anything?
Where does it say that abortion should be banned?Here it is below. Please explain for us where you find abortion in there.
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Tenth AmendmentWhere does it say that abortion should be banned?
You are still ignoring R v.W and how it came to be.
And that was absurd. Its a states issue for the states to set their own rules. Get over it.