REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Never forget…
- Thread starter Duffy LaCoronilla
- Start date
There’s really no way to have informed consent on medical interventions - you have to trust that the investigators and regulators did their jobs in the trials and evaluations. Now we know that they don’t - the CDC and FDA are compromised and captured by the pharmaceutical industry and will approve just about anything. Some of the regulators had some pangs of conscience about it like in that video I posted about Covid vax adverse events, but it’s not enough to fix the system.
bullshit
a patient can be provided with relevant information and a patient can make a choice based on that information
can and should!
abandoning the principle of informed consent has all sorts of awful long-term side effects
Last edited:
So next time you have surgery make sure you tell the doctors and nurses not to wear 'em.
Yeah, but you’re relying on regulators and mfrs for the quality and reliability of that information. The quality appears to be low and possibly fraudulent.
right. so the "informed" part of informed consent is difficult right now. and the "consent" part of informed consent is being ignored completely by the mandates.
but neither of these points change the fact that abandoning the principle of informed consent has serious long-term consequences that decision makers are ignoring when they choose to mandate COVID 19 shots.
mischaracterizationTrue statement.
Gotta love living in the United States of Idiocracy where they MANDATE things with uncertain effectiveness.
Team America, fook YEAH!
because this one meta-analysis was inconclusive does not negate the extensive body of scientific knowledge that has repeatedly demonstrated masks are effective at limiting the spread of airborne viruses
when faced with facts that don't conform to your bias, the only solution is to...double down on your incorrect assertions and continue to ignore the facts.
holy fk, schex....new day, same idiot
My sisters got them to get the pay raise.
But they are both expert educators.
So just because you have an Ed degree doesn't mean you are an idiot.
Though in Shxes case . . .
They work for bacteria which why surgeons wear them. They don’t work for viruses. It says so right on the package.
It was NOT the relevant metric for COVID. COVID is airborne vapors. The virus passes right through surgical and cloth masks (which we knew all along and was pointed out here 3 years ago) and as the study above show they found no evidence that N95s were any better in real life applications.all types of masks assist with particle and droplet protection which was the relevant metric for Covid.... and n95 protect against viruses...it says so right on the package, as DUFFMAN would say
N95s work when fitted and worn properly which almost nobody does.
Last edited:
"airborne vapors"
lol....what's a vapor, DUFFMAN?
holy fk....
and why do you continue to make false claims? the author of the study says in the study itself that it's inconclusive
why mischaracterize, DUFFMAN?
there is plenty of research that shows from cloth, to surgical, to n95 users enjoy progressively more benefit in reduction of transmission by limiting the...vapors
goddamn, is it going to be another one of those days for you, DUFFMAN?
Indoor Air and Coronavirus (COVID-19) | US EPA
EPA recommends precautions to reduce the potential airborne transmission of the virus, such as ventilation and air filtration as a part of a larger strategy that includes minimizing close contact, surface cleaning, handwashing, and other precautions.
www.epa.gov
“Spread of COVID-19 occurs via airborne particles and droplets. People who are infected with COVID can release particles and droplets of respiratory fluids that contain the SARS CoV-2 virus into the air when they exhale (e.g., quiet breathing, speaking, singing, exercise, coughing, sneezing). The droplets or aerosol particles vary across a wide range of sizes – from visible to microscopic.”
You have no defense
From the META study (sounds conclusive to me)
"Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.09; 9 trials, 276,917 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence. Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 6 trials, 13,919 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence)."
Yet washing hands did show to be effective
Weird how all the mainstream media just ignores the biggest study to date
which is exactly what I said before you made your stupid fkn vapor comment...Indoor Air and Coronavirus (COVID-19) | US EPA
EPA recommends precautions to reduce the potential airborne transmission of the virus, such as ventilation and air filtration as a part of a larger strategy that includes minimizing close contact, surface cleaning, handwashing, and other precautions.
“Spread of COVID-19 occurs via airborne particles and droplets. People who are infected with COVID can release particles and droplets of respiratory fluids that contain the SARS CoV-2 virus into the air when they exhale (e.g., quiet breathing, speaking, singing, exercise, coughing, sneezing). The droplets or aerosol particles vary across a wide range of sizes – from visible to microscopic.”
DUFFMAN GONNA DUFFMAN
fkn hell you are a disaster
Is there a lower form of life than an academic?
www.eugyppius.com
Lead author of the Cochrane mask review on the total absence of evidence for the efficacy of masking, and Cochrane's early and apparently deliberate interference in the publication of these results
Yet again, The Science follows politics.
www.eugyppius.com
noIs there a lower form of life than an academic?
Lead author of the Cochrane mask review on the total absence of evidence for the efficacy of masking, and Cochrane's early and apparently deliberate interference in the publication of these results
Yet again, The Science follows politics.