REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Ocean level is barely different today than it was 1966.Compare the ocean level at Rincon 1966 vs today. View attachment 104067
flat rocks bro, not sharp at all. even your princess feet would have no problem scurrying across at low tide.Can you say booties?
I surfed a spot in Morocco with a friend. We were warned not to leave anything on the beach or it would get stolen, so we took turns surfing . I went first. It was a little sketchy, kind of murky water, head high and grindy. Couldn't see the bottom. When I got out the tide was beginning to drop. My friend goes out and the tide goes way out, like that photo. Only the bottom was composed of rocks where most of the rock eroded but there were like veins of hard stone sticking up. I felt really bad for my buddy. It took him like 30 minutes to walk in.
Ocean level is barely different today than it was 1966.
Best measurements we have estimate global average sea level rise around 8 in over the last 100 years (mostly due to thermal expansion).
What you see in that photo is called “low tide”.
You can see by the marks on the sand (and the sea life on the rocks) that a few hours earlier that was all under water during what is called “high tide”.
A couple years ago during what was during probably a 3 year run of no-swell winters a friend of mine basically said this was how it’s going to be because of climate change.Guaranteed OP knew that, but a lie by omission in the name of sea level rise was worth a shot.
Yep. And even when you offer a scientifically supported opinion that just happens to differ from theirs, you are a "science denier". End of discussion.A couple years ago during what was during probably a 3 year run of no-swell winters a friend of mine basically said this was how it’s going to be because of climate change.
Last week he attributed this recent month long run of non-stop surf to....
....climate change.
Also, during the recent king tides was at the beach at high tide and overheard people talking about how shocked and worried they were about this rapidly accelerating ocean level rise.
I told them to come back in a few hours and be shocked again at how quickly it reversed itself.
I’m always amazed at how people who know nothing about tides, swell, weather, causes of beach erosion, El Niño, localized ocean temp, etc. consider themselves people of science.
“Because science” has become the new checkmate in arguments. You just have to say the word. Maybe toss in “data” and “studies show” for the ultimate death blow.
Its worse than that. All you have to do is ask them to show the science they claim to be citing and you’re a denier.Yep. And even when you offer a scientifically supported opinion that just happens to differ from theirs, you are a "science denier". End of discussion.
I've surfed Rincon many a time. Was just reacting to the rock field. But even at Rincon I'd find a way to slip and have my foot slide over a barnacle or mussel. I've had cuts on the bottom of my feet or the worst was on my heel that took forever to heal because I kept walking on them and they'd reopen (kind of like the one on my hand right now).flat rocks bro, not sharp at all. even your princess feet would have no problem scurrying across at low tide.
Key news is major source of stupidity here in 805...Its worse than that. All you have to do is ask them to show the science they claim to be citing and you’re a denier.
The tv show news? Haven’t watched it in a couple decades.Key news is major source of stupidity here in 805...
Lopez was the beach who had drinking problem and was married to a judge so she got off. CJ ward is kook who got rescued by SBFD at bedwetter on head high day.The tv show news? Haven’t watched it in a couple decades.
All I can remember about it is the one news news babe that had an alcohol problem and IIRC she got a DUI fixed by the judge she was fucking (I may not be getting the details right).
The other one was a news dude who went surfing at Ledbetter and had to be rescued because the surf was so “huge” it broke his leash so without his board he was basically helpless.
Then he goes on tv talking about ocean safety.
Am I getting these right?