REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Hotties of Yesteryear
- Thread starter r32
- Start date
two that had solid runs of hotness ( probably 50 ish years by some standards ) ... a good sub-category: longevity
pam greer .... smoking from every angle & ready to rock USA style
Catherine Deneuve ... of belle du jour - class with selective vulgarity
pam greer .... smoking from every angle & ready to rock USA style
Catherine Deneuve ... of belle du jour - class with selective vulgarity
Looks like it would be painful to sit in those shorts. I think one of my balls would burst or at the very least find their way to daylight out of one of the leg openings.
Yeah, “standing room only” shortsLooks like it would be painful to sit in those shorts. I think one of my balls would burst or at the very least find their way to daylight out of one of the leg openings.
Them shorts are like a cheap hotel, no ball room
Yeah if you accidentally got in the wrong position it could be testy for the testes.
This discussion of John Wayne’s balls has to stop.
Pussy, not balls.
Pussy, not balls.
John Wayne was a fag. I installed two-way mirrors in his pad in Brentwood, and he come to the door in a dress.
Lighting is too perfect.
Shadows are fake af.
Reverse image search on Google shows only one other instance for this image.
Google Lens
lens.google.com
Compare with any other image of that time period and it should be obvious.
Gotcha. I knew it looked manipulated, but dang. sexy AI bitches but that’s creepy AF. I’d imagine it won’t be long until they’re spot on, ugh.Lighting is too perfect.
Shadows are fake af.
Reverse image search on Google shows only one other instance for this image.
Google Lens
Compare with any other image of that time period and it should be obvious.
View attachment 175106
View attachment 175107
Susan Dey - me too! She was so beautiful and wise and smart. And she got to eat Tacos at a Taco stand. What the hell were Tacos? When I got to San Diego my friend took me to Taco Bell and we ate Tacos outside just like on TV!This got off topic somewhat, but in a way 1/2 those rods are hotties from yesteryear.
Most are obsolete by today's rail rod standards.
I still fish 'em though.
BTW Keen, I cut my T540-10 down a foot after getting my ass whooped by a 50lb yellowtail.
I'll take this to the "Fishing just for the Halibut" thread now
Back to the real hotties.
God, I had a pre-teen crush on Susan Dey
View attachment 174404
And Peggy Lipton - The Mod Squad - she was hot to 7th grade me!
AI is not yet good at certain things.
It's not good a text within photo-real images. Wrong font styles, misspelled words, and sometimes garbled letters. Check signage in the background of image.
It not good at shadows. Struggles to produce accurate shadows. Quite often the shadow shape is wrong for the source light, and it's way too dark or clearly outlined.
It's not good at hands, although in this image it did a pretty good job. Look for messed up fingers or the hand is twisted in some unreal way, or elongated/smushed.
Few other things too but these are the things that are easiest to spot.
Once they work out the kinks for AI images (give it 10 years or so), 99% of the public won't be able to tell AI from a real image.