REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Or just raise the state income tax, what's paying 12% if you already pay 11%? Meanwhile, keep doling pensions based on 98% of a state employees last year's salary before retirement, for the rest of their livescasa_mugrienta said:We should divert gas tax "money for road repairs" to fill in the gaps in high speed rail funding.
Or how about just an additional gas tax?
Yes!grapedrink said:Or just raise the state income tax, what's paying 12% if you already pay 11%? Meanwhile, keep doling pensions based on 98% of a state employees last year's salary before retirement, for the rest of their livescasa_mugrienta said:We should divert gas tax "money for road repairs" to fill in the gaps in high speed rail funding.
Or how about just an additional gas tax?
only for the Central Valley leg, too much opposition from you aggro SoCal f*cks to make it work down there. Up here we will be using rickshawsCharmingSophisticate said:I'm assuming that a bike lane is going come with this.
the janitor said:only for the Central Valley leg, too much opposition from you aggro SoCal f*cks to make it work down there. Up here we will be using rickshawsCharmingSophisticate said:I'm assuming that a bike lane is going come with this.
Why don’t you sit in your car for 4 hours a day and let other people take the train.ifallalot said:Yes!grapedrink said:Or just raise the state income tax, what's paying 12% if you already pay 11%? Meanwhile, keep doling pensions based on 98% of a state employees last year's salary before retirement, for the rest of their livescasa_mugrienta said:We should divert gas tax "money for road repairs" to fill in the gaps in high speed rail funding.
Or how about just an additional gas tax?
Great plan!
Don't like the gas tax? Use public transportation!
This project is not perfect. It’s poorly conceived.grapedrink said:I'm all for trains, although I question how well traveled this particular route will actually be. It will be faster and most likely cheaper to fly if you need to go between SF and LA. Otherwise, how often do people from SF or LA really care to go somewhere in the Central Valley, or from the valley to the big city :confused2:
Now if it went up and down the 101 corridor, then you'd have something
The high speed rail is not a choice. It is from like Bakersfield to Tracy and has zero infrastructure planned to get you to where you actually need to go from Bako or Tracy.FecalFace said:Why don’t you sit in your car for 4 hours a day and let other people take the train.ifallalot said:Yes!grapedrink said:Or just raise the state income tax, what's paying 12% if you already pay 11%? Meanwhile, keep doling pensions based on 98% of a state employees last year's salary before retirement, for the rest of their livescasa_mugrienta said:We should divert gas tax "money for road repairs" to fill in the gaps in high speed rail funding.
Or how about just an additional gas tax?
Great plan!
Don't like the gas tax? Use public transportation!
If you are dumb enough to believe that 1 person to a car is a viable mode of transportation in CA in foreseeable future and that building more roads is a solution for relieving the traffic problem in SC, instead of investing in public transportation options, you deserve to waste your life sitting in traffic and listening to your dumb right wing kook podcasts.
It’s about having a choice.
It cracks me up when you talk about your liberties being taken away from you but you want to take other people’s liberties away.
Democrat said:Haters
Before you blow your tops, how many of you have ever tried to commute between Victorville and Tracy? This high speed rail is a blessing to at least a dozen people.
He's just that fucked in the head. No logic whatsoever.ifallalot said:The high speed rail is not a choice. It is from like Bakersfield to Tracy and has zero infrastructure planned to get you to where you actually need to go from Bako or Tracy.FecalFace said:Why don’t you sit in your car for 4 hours a day and let other people take the train.ifallalot said:Yes!grapedrink said:Or just raise the state income tax, what's paying 12% if you already pay 11%? Meanwhile, keep doling pensions based on 98% of a state employees last year's salary before retirement, for the rest of their livescasa_mugrienta said:We should divert gas tax "money for road repairs" to fill in the gaps in high speed rail funding.
Or how about just an additional gas tax?
Great plan!
Don't like the gas tax? Use public transportation!
If you are dumb enough to believe that 1 person to a car is a viable mode of transportation in CA in foreseeable future and that building more roads is a solution for relieving the traffic problem in SC, instead of investing in public transportation options, you deserve to waste your life sitting in traffic and listening to your dumb right wing kook podcasts.
It’s about having a choice.
It cracks me up when you talk about your liberties being taken away from you but you want to take other people’s liberties away.
How you equate this to taking other people's liberty away?