REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I miss the old LA Times way of reporting.
Not my job. I'm not going to scroll the googles to find an example to appease your dumb request. I've clearly explained why the article sucks and how it could be made better. If you are writing an article about why a specific law is bad, then maybe you should start with detailing the actual law early in the article?
The 5 Ws is writing 101, i.e. a step above basic literacy. And if you are writing about why something is bad/important/damaging to society, then explaining what that thing early in the article should be a top priority because it strengthens and gives context for the rest of your piece.
LOL, binary thinking much? I wouldn't know because I don't read Breitbart or any other opinion and emotion driven garbage, like the article posted above, whether it's from the right or the left.Until they're asked to provide a good example of where they get their news. I bet Breitbart has a "well written" article on the subject.
What's really shameful about it is that CNN doesn't even have a "To the Comments!" excuse working for them.
“The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people wrongly overestimate their knowledge or ability in a specific area. This tends to occur because a lack of self-awareness prevents them from accurately assessing their own skills.”
www.google.com
if you took a second to read my follow-up, I said that you were correct and that I should stay away from CNN as a source.
It’s emotionally driven because it doesn’t even explain the actual law until halfway thru the article after 12 paragraphs of tirade. Even if the argument is factual it can still be emo driven, both can #coexist
Wrong! Your pretense of being a journalism expert is an obvious symptom of Dunning-Kruger.“The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people wrongly overestimate their knowledge or ability in a specific area. This tends to occur because a lack of self-awareness prevents them from accurately assessing their own skills.”
Dunning-Kruger Effect
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people wrongly overestimate their knowledge or ability in a specific area. This tends to occur because a lack of self-awareness prevents them from accurately assessing their own skills.
You’ve incorrectly called any perceived form of bias to be DK. Ironically, you’ve displayed DK in your accusation of DK. Because you’re dumb.
LMAO you not liking the layout doesn't mean it's emotionally driven, and I don't see a tirade. I see objective facts.
My bad for missing that and thank you for posting a better source that did exactly what I asked for.
Who exactly should I be calling out? If you mean people like GromsDad, I’ve tried. He simply doubles down on his positions, ignores counter arguments, and ghosts when proven wrong.
I don’t care so much about the 5 Ws and am willing to give that a pass, but if you are writing an article about a new law and why it’s bad, then start the article by explaining that law FFS
