Yes, EVs are more efficient, cheaper to run, less toxic, less maintenance work and cost, quieter, faster....
What's your problem with them?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Gasoline Gasoline!
- Thread starter GromsDad
- Start date
What's your problem with them?
Yes, of course there's an agenda. It's been well spelled out at both the Federal and State levels. I mean, how much more clear can "California will ban the sale of all new ICE cars by 2035" be?
Suggesting "lefties" have an EV agenda is about as gotcha-ish as suggesting conservatives dislike abortion.
Not yet, why?
What's the gotcha?
Is everything I said untrue because I didn't buy one yet?
No gotcha, just wanting you to put your money where your mouth is
There's obviously still tons of advantages to ICE vehicles, otherwise, everyone would already drive EVs
There's no gotcha but then there it is in the next sentence.
I don't have a Porsche either, does it mean it's a sh!t car?
What kind of logic is this?
What's happened to you? You used to be semi-smart.
How does the fact that I don't have an EV yet, prove anything I said incorrect?
I have one.
It's superior to any car I've owned. Fast, quiet, easy and inexpensive to charge, fun to drive.
But not everyone needs a new car right now, and not everyone can afford a new EV right now. Over the next 12 years, this will change.
i'm not playing your silly gotcha game
I just want to know if we're all on the same page here
In 12 years we'll probably be talking about banning ev's
That's the ONLY game you're playing.
You haven't said anything of substance yet.
And I mean ever.
You used to have a Porsche thoughThere's no gotcha but then there it is in the next sentence.
I don't have a Porsche either, does it mean it's a sh!t car?
What kind of logic is this?
What's happened to you? You used to be semi-smart.
How does the fact that I don't have an EV yet, prove anything I said incorrect?
You used to be all about lived experience too, now you're ok with research and theory?
If an EV was as superior as you say it was, you'd already have one, and do whatever it takes to put yourself in that superior car
I don't have a problem with ev's, like i said above i'd have one myself if they handled my needs
but i feel that in 12 years or so (when they are more capable and affordable to everyone) they'll be on the way out
So I sold the Porsche, that means it was sh!t, right?
I would have still have it, if it was a superior car, right?
Now I drive a Subaru, which means Subaru is better than Porsche?
It's the dumbest gotcha ever.
I'd buy a Rivian tomorrow if I could actually drive it off the lot the same day.
That doesn't mean it won't happen next year.
I'm not interested in sedans so Tesla is out of question.
None of it says anything about viability of EVs.
You are not making any sense.
