How so?The push to restrict abortion is a pendulum swing from the pro-abortion people taking it too far.
What are you basing this on?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
How so?The push to restrict abortion is a pendulum swing from the pro-abortion people taking it too far.
Please tell me who wants late term, third trimester abortions, unless it is a medical issue?
How so?
What are you basing this on?
NY, Virginia, and at least a couple other states that recently passed laws that basically legalize infanticideHow so?
What are you basing this on?
The old fallacy again where the Left tries to defend just how indefensible its positions arePlease tell me who wants late term, third trimester abortions, unless it is a medical issue?
I dunno about third trimester but if an amniocentesis (usually performed during second trimester) indicates genetic disorders, shouldn't abortion be an option?The old fallacy again where the Left tries to defend just how indefensible its positions are
So. my position is: late term abortions should be allowed if medically necessary (for the health of the mother, and if a child is deemed unviable at birth, or with severe physical/medical defects and it is detected - if detected, this choice should be made within a time frame, and not waited till the last minute)The old fallacy again where the Left tries to defend just how indefensible its positions are
Reguurgiating right wing talking points like a good little sheep.NY, Virginia, and at least a couple other states that recently passed laws that basically legalize infanticide
Again, you do the same exact thing.The old fallacy again where the Left tries to defend just how indefensible its positions are
Do you think it will be harder for women to get an abortion if the far right is successful in their power grab with the help of the Devil Trump?NY, Virginia, and at least a couple other states that recently passed laws that basically legalize infanticide
under what circumstances, ifallalot?NY, Virginia, and at least a couple other states that recently passed laws that basically legalize infanticide
Don’t get pregnant in the first place. Birth control is cheap and easy for both genders and so is Plan B if you know you made a mistakeDo you think it will be harder for women to get an abortion if the far right is successful in their power grab with the help of the Devil Trump?
It should be harder at certain times in the pregnancy, otherwise the status quo is fineSo the answer is yes?
The "health of the mother" can often be defined as "I will be clinically depressed if I have to care for a baby", or "I will go crazy if I have to carry this baby to term", and so on. Happens all the time in states where the mommy's health clause drives the law.So. my position is: late term abortions should be allowed if medically necessary (for the health of the mother, and if a child is deemed unviable at birth, or with severe physical/medical defects and it is detected - if detected, this choice should be made within a time frame, and not waited till the last minute)