Does the Bern stand a chance?

Surfdog

Duke status
Apr 22, 2001
21,777
1,997
113
South coast OR
slippery slope fallacy
I thought they'd have a half-way decent response to my earlier equation of "basic needs" that need providing by government.

They can't. If uni-healthcare "for all" is a "right" or "vital necessity", then all those other basics are even more-so a "right" to be provided, by full taxation if necessary.

Maybe if we increase taxes enough, we COULD pay for it all as a "right" as they "should" be. Ya?

What makes healthcare for all most important to be a "right" than all other basic needs a majority need to just live/survive in a modern society?

No one on the left can answer that simple question.

As listed again: water, food, housing, waste disposal/treatment, utilities including internet now, public transportation. All aspects of modern society we deem as "necessary" to at least get by/survive daily on. Healthcare seems pretty low on that totem pole of absolute necessity on a average daily basis for a majority at any given moment. Yes, we pay some taxes/fees on some of those now, but far from guv "provided".

I still don't see people all over dying in the streets for lack of healthcare. Even many illegal immigrants get basically "free" healthcare, and not expected to pay for it. You see it all the time at the General Hospitals in our nation. Signs on the walls in their ER's basically guarantee it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

everysurfer

Phil Edwards status
Sep 9, 2013
6,713
1,811
113
Santa Barbara County
Tell me what makes healthcare different than any other market commodity that we need.

Food and water, shelter, sanitation, even electricity/gas are more important to overall survival than healthcare- shouldn't these things be "rights" too?
I'm not going to catch a run down apartment or shabby clothes if you breath on me, but I'm going to get Corona virus if we don't give you antibiotics
 

Surfdog

Duke status
Apr 22, 2001
21,777
1,997
113
South coast OR
Doubt the beach front is populated by guvmint clerks. Way more likely they work for insurance companies and big Pharma, and the people who lend them money.
The sarcasm flew right over. My beach front comment was IF we had all "necessities" of life guaranteed as a "right". If housing was a "right", who determines where and what house I get? Most would likely get the tenements, and the well connected would get the beach front mansions, like most 3rd world governments where property "rights" are controlled.

I could see the AOC squadkateers tearing down all the beachfront mansions, and replacing them with high rise condos for all. Ya, that would be "cool", right? Beach fronts for all!!
 
Last edited:

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,654
23,266
113
I love all the mischaracterization and logical fallacy

great takedown here

 

rice

Duke status
Jul 2, 2002
24,304
1,801
113
CA
Don't we already have "socialism" for fire, police, military, road and utility construction/maintenance, education through 12 grade and healthcare for folks over 65?

Bernie wants to add college and healthcare for people under 65.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aruka and afoaf

GDaddy

Duke status
Jan 17, 2006
29,238
2,056
113
Carlsbad
Don't we already have "socialism" for fire, police, military, road and utility construction/maintenance, education through 12 grade and healthcare for folks over 65?

Bernie wants to add college and healthcare for people under 65.
Those are negotiated benefits which accrue to their respective employment. They're not entitlements and there's no guarantee that they can't be reduced or eliminated altogether in the future.

.
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,996
18,046
113
I'm not going to catch a run down apartment or shabby clothes if you breath on me, but I'm going to get Corona virus if we don't give you antibiotics
No you won't.

Antibiotics won't do sh!t against a virus

But that being said, a homeless person with a bad diet is going to be a lot more susceptible to starting a plague than someone with proper shelter, so I think you should pay to make sure they are fed, homed and clothed as well
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,996
18,046
113
address your fallacy?
It's not a fallacy.

It is a natural extension of the same argument you're making for healthcare, using things that are more important to overall health than the medical industry
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,654
23,266
113
that's not the argument I am making for healthcare

I don't think the way you and surfdog frame it reflects anyone's argument for single payer option

your slippery sloping a straw man
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,996
18,046
113
that's not the argument I am making for healthcare

I don't think the way you and surfdog frame it reflects anyone's argument for single payer option

your slippery sloping a straw man
That's everyone's argument for single payer.

You have heard, healthcare is a right, haven't you?

Cambria effect
 

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
42,338
2,105
113
The Californias
No you won't.

Antibiotics won't do sh!t against a virus

But that being said, a homeless person with a bad diet is going to be a lot more susceptible to starting a plague than someone with proper shelter, so I think you should pay to make sure they are fed, homed and clothed as well
So when you get the homeless plague and your insurance tells you they're not going to pay for your treatment, will you die happy?