Do you think that the January 6th hearings should be televised in prime time?

[GromsDad]

From CNN's website. See if you can pick out the key detail common in both of these headlines:

Headline #1

View attachment 132657


Headline #2

View attachment 132656



How do you think this testimony would hold up under cross examination?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

You fools are being played.

Exactly - she's not claiming first-hand witness to these things - only what she heard or was told. Unfortunately for you, she is completely credible, whether this particular item is accurate or not. You seem completely disconnected to the issues at hand.

You guys are fools. From CNN's own headlines "Ex-aide was told". Have you no grasp of what those words mean? At best, she didn't witness anything and "was told" a bullshit story. At worst, she made the whole thing up. This was your star witness. You're a joke.

 

[Pico]

Star witness? Shes just a scurrilous detail of deliciousness. Star Witness? Oh the hilarity. We all know what she said is true too.

 

[Pico]

Trump's embrace of armed supporters converging on Washington, DC, could also provide fodder for separate civil lawsuits from House lawmakers and Capitol police officers who allege that he helped instigate the violence of January 6. Following Hutchinson's testimony Tuesday, Rep. Ruben Gallego said that "US Capitol Police officers were sent to be potentially slaughtered" on January 6.


And as the Capitol attack unfolded on January 6, Trump appeared unfazed by reports that his supporters were chanting "hang Mike Pence." Trump instead defended his supporters ransacking the Capitol and suggested that Pence "deserves it," Hutchinson testified.

At one point, when Cipollone implored Meadows to persuade Trump to try to stop the violence, Hutchinson testified that Meadows responded: "You heard it, Pat. He thinks Mike deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong."

 

[Pico]

Other legal experts saw "smoking gun" evidence that could support a seditious conspiracy charge. And at the hearing's conclusion, the House panel presented evidence of witness tampering connected to the January 6 investigation.

"If you have your White House counsel saying, 'Do this and we're going to get charged with every crime imaginable,' that's pretty good evidence of your state of mind. You got legal advice that this would be criminal," Eliason told Insider.

The concerns about legal risk continued after January 6. In the aftermath of the Capitol attack, Hutchinson said, Meadows and Rudy Giuliani sought pardons from Trump. Neither received one.

 

[GromsDad]

The desperation is real folks. Just look at Pico here.

 

[ghost_of_lewis_samuels]

I understand the questioning of the aide by those who are doubtful.

Though i'm wondering - for anyone who believes that Trump is in the right (not guilty of any crimes) - is there anything that would change your mind?

Would a verdict in a court of law do it, any evidence or what?

 

[sirfun]

I understand the questioning of the aide by those who are doubtful.

Though i'm wondering - for anyone who believes that Trump is in the right (not guilty of any crimes) - is there anything that would change your mind?

when the doofus potus starts bragging they will move seamlessly from denial to justification !! )

 

[GromsDad]

I understand the questioning of the aide by those who are doubtful.

Though i'm wondering - for anyone who believes that Trump is in the right (not guilty of any crimes) - is there anything that would change your mind?

Would a verdict in a court of law do it, any evidence or what?

After what we witnessed from the democrats and the media for the past five and a half years????
FOOOOK NO!!!!!!

 

[sirfun]

 

[sussle]

The desperation is real folks. Just look at Pico here.

she is quite credible and it's disturbing you.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/28/politics/january-6-hearing-day-6-takeaways-hutchinson/index.html

 

[manbearpig]

After what we witnessed from the democrats and the media for the past five and a half years????
FOOOOK NO!!!!!!

So guilty of crimes or not doesn’t matter to you in our politicians. Noted.

 

[GromsDad]

So guilty of crimes or not doesn’t matter to you in our politicians. Noted.

Get back to me after you prosecute all of the crimes by democrats that precede what you allege. Until then you can fook right off.

 

[ghost_of_lewis_samuels]

After what we witnessed from the democrats and the media for the past five and a half years????
FOOOOK NO!!!!!!

So why keep commenting, following?

If even when presented w/compelling evidence you'll ignore, why play along.

Purely for sport?

 

[GromsDad]

Let me sum up the testimony of the democrat's star witness yesterday:

"My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Trump choke out the limo driver."

 

[ghost_of_lewis_samuels]

Let me sum up the testimony of the democrat's star witness yesterday:

"My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Trump choke out the limo driver."

5th ave

 

[GromsDad]

5th ave

You just can't accept how little credibility your side has and how little the country really cares about January 6th at this stage.

 

[ghost_of_lewis_samuels]

You just can't accept how little credibility your side has and how little the country really cares about January 6th at this stage.

im not on any side

you lack in thought.

 

[manbearpig]

Get back to me after you prosecute all of the crimes by democrats that precede what you allege. Until then you can fook right off.

I have no problem with any politician who has committed a crime to be prosecuted for them.

you however don’t seem to want that to happen.

 

[sussle]

Let me sum up the testimony of the democrat's star witness yesterday:

"My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Trump choke out the limo driver."

Leaving out the best parts, no?

Former White House aide delivers shocking testimony about out-of-control Trump on Jan. 6

Cassidy Hutchinson's remarks portrayed Donald Trump as spiraling into an increasingly manic rage as he continued his last-ditch effort to seize a second term he didn’t win.

www.politico.com

The testimony bolstered the narrative that the committee has been driving toward over the last few weeks: That Trump incited and supported the insurrection as part of a desperate power grab to steal a second term, and that many of his top advisers thought his schemes were illegal.

 

[sirfun]

You just can't accept how little credibility your side has and how little the country really cares about January 6th at this stage.

keep saying that in front of a mirror !! )

I am glad YOU care enough and that you are here !! )

Opinion | The Effing President Gets His Comeuppance

White House insider Cassidy Hutchinson blows the whistle on Trump.

www.politico.com