REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Daytona Gun Show
- Thread starter griffinsurfboard
- Start date
Probably fewer than 2% of handguns and well under 1% of all guns will ever be involved in a violent crime. Thus, the problem of criminal gun violence is concentrated within a very small subset of gun owners, indicating that gun control aimed at the general population faces a serious needle-in-the-haystack problem.
Fecal is a clueless idiot but he thinks he knows how government can stop bad people from getting deadly weapons because he thinks he's smart and woke.
Growing up my grandfather was really into all things shooting, hunting and fishing. He had a big library of books on everything related to the topics. Growing up in the 70s and 80s (no internet back then) I would read many of those books. I remember one of the books detailed the lives of people in Appalachia and how they survived largely separated from the rest of society. One of the books gave very detailed instructions and recipes for how the people of Appalachia would make gunpowder from commonly found ingredients. I'm pretty sure it was in the Foxfire series of books. If dirt poor people in Appalachia can make gunpowder out of simple common items imagine what modern people with today's tech can do if they had to or if they were criminally inclined.
Three of the top ten Democratic candidates are calling for mandatory buybacks. Otherwise known as "prohibition."
Are you day drinking again dummy?
Last edited:
20 seconds on Google yielded this: https://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com/2016/04/backwoods-gunpowder-making.html
War on drugs. 20+% of everyone is or has been in violation of these laws. Maybe more. If people have successfully chosen to flout the drug laws without being ostracized by society then mocking the possibility of the same thing happening with possession of guns becomes pretty silly.
Last edited:
You are not thinking very highly of American people.
Being antisocial is not in human nature for majority of people.
Most humans thrive on cooperation, not conflict.
There will always be criminals.
Your obsession with 3D gun printing being a huge deal, is just like obsession with Yin/Yang sign becoming a hate sign because one person wrote something stupid on the internet.
Why are you so terrible at valid comparisons?
Check the premise of your meme stupid.
Military also has drones, missiles and F-35s
So yes, AR15s are useless in a fight against the military.
I'm citing human nature and social behavior. You're the one who is making moral comparisons.
Right now the push is on to decriminalize some acts which have previously been deemed as crimes so as to not stigmatize the people who like to violate those laws. The advocates for that want us to give up on the enforcement of those laws as being futile or unjust or counterproductive.
LOL
Right now the push is on to decriminalize some acts which have previously been deemed as crimes so as to not stigmatize the people who like to violate those laws. The advocates for that want us to give up on the enforcement of those laws as being futile or unjust or counterproductive.
LOL
Last edited:
You are citing human nature and social behavior that is not prevalent and pretending it's prevalent.
You mega super high IQ that you inherited because you were born in America is not helping you much here.
If you went to college, you could have done better than being a failed cop.
if we're talking about drugs, I don't believe policy changes have anything to
do with concern for the stigmatization of users so much as law enforcement
re-evaluating enforcement priorities and the voting public being squarely in
favor of more personal choice.
criminal justice reform laws that allow felons to vote and prevent employers
from asking if an applicant is a felon, on the other hand, could be counted as
a shift towards de-stigmatization.
So you're saying that the news reports of there supposedly being as many or more guns than people in the U.S. is fake news?
Suit yourself. However prevalent it actually is or isn't will continue on regardless of my opinion of it or your's.
BTW, I never said I was super smart. I'm just smarter that you. Most people are.
Every time a comparison is made that shows how stupid you are- Y U SO BAHD CUMPARISON
Like clockwork
I do. Perhaps you should try it?
If you meant to say "total prohibition" you should have included the qualifier.
You didn't.
You're not very good at this.