Is that supposed to make it better?third, you probably won’t even be able to see them from the beach
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Is that supposed to make it better?third, you probably won’t even be able to see them from the beach
Being unable to see them from shore was an early talking point of the windmill crowd and lying politicians that was quickly debunked once people got to see the plans. From Atlantic City to Seaside Heights, NJ you're going to be looking at a wall off them 9-15 miles from shore and each with a red flashing beacon on it for your night time viewing pleasure so planes don't hit them.Is that supposed to make it better?
1. i never hear you complaining about the casinosWhy are you knowingly posting lies? Its a known fact. They will be plainly visible. As close as 9-miles off the beach and significantly taller than Ocean Casino. Ocean Casino is visible from 20+ miles.
NEVER FORGET SEA DRILL!What about when it’s used for mapping oil reserves?
were you in favor of obamas moratorium on drilling along the eastern seaboard ?
I believe I specifically stipulated I was opposed to offshore oil? Didn’t I also stipulate that that if the windmills are the answer they should keep them on land as opposed to putting them in the ocean? I‘m not seeing the “cleaner energy” given those previously stated parameters. Ocean based windmills are no cleaner than land based windmills. It’s just that NIMBY. Humans don’t want them in their backyard and nature doesn’t litigate.And the surfers point is goofy.
I could just as easily say I’m surprised surfers wouldnt be in favor of cleaner energy and moving away from oil extracting like what is done with offshore oil. It doesn’t mean anything.
and no one’s said they should be allowed to run amuck either.
Sorry I missed that, fast reader and probably dyslexic. I’m not opposed to land or sea applications of wind power if done properly. It 100% needs to be regulated and held accountable. There’s always going to be a “not in my backyard” group; land or sea. It’s inevitable.I believe I specifically stipulated I was opposed to offshore oil? Didn’t I also stipulate that that if the windmills are the answer they should keep them on land as opposed to putting them in the ocean? I‘m not seeing the “cleaner energy” given those previously stated parameters. Ocean based windmills are no cleaner than land based windmills. It’s just that NIMBY. Humans don’t want them in their backyard and nature doesn’t litigate.
let's not forget that large numbers of whale deaths have occurred up and down the eastern seaboard over the last two decades predating any wind farm developmentThese methods have been used for a very long time in many applications both industrial and military. Yet now they’re suddenly attributed to whale deaths?
Stop whining.I believe I specifically stipulated I was opposed to offshore oil? Didn’t I also stipulate that that if the windmills are the answer they should keep them on land as opposed to putting them in the ocean? I‘m not seeing the “cleaner energy” given those previously stated parameters. Ocean based windmills are no cleaner than land based windmills. It’s just that NIMBY. Humans don’t want them in their backyard and nature doesn’t litigate.
Yep. I bring this up constantly, so strange how it’s never addressedlet's not forget that large numbers of whale deaths have occurred up and down the eastern seaboard over the last two decades predating any wind farm development
But how many acres of nature do they ruin compared to a natural gas plant?1. i never hear you complaining about the casinos
2. the wind turbines won’t be as close as the casino and you won’ be surfing 9-15 miles out to sea.
I think it’s interesting that to watch grossfat give away the game here. He pivoted from “save the whales” to “buhhhhhh my view!!”
To ifall’s point above, over their lifespan, wind turbines have something like a 40x lower carbon footprint than burning natural gas. View attachment 177240
Yesok, setting aside the view issue, are ifail and grossflab ready to say they’re against offshore drilling?
it‘s for the benefit of the whales and the marine life after all.
that’s a really good point and i don’t have a great answer other than “we should be investing in next-gen mini nuclear reactors“But how many acres of nature do they ruin compared to a natural gas plant?
“Carbon” is not the be all and end all of pollution/natural destruction
An issue no one has mentioned, is the effect the different anchoring systems of said turbine's have on the ocean floor.I believe I specifically stipulated I was opposed to offshore oil? Didn’t I also stipulate that that if the windmills are the answer they should keep them on land as opposed to putting them in the ocean? I‘m not seeing the “cleaner energy” given those previously stated parameters. Ocean based windmills are no cleaner than land based windmills. It’s just that NIMBY. Humans don’t want them in their backyard and nature doesn’t litigate.
First off, the picture you posted is not accurate to the windmills being proposed. Windmills do come in different sizes and the ones being planned for off of NJ are the biggest ones out there.1. i never hear you complaining about the casinos
2. the wind turbines won’t be as close as the casino and you won’ be surfing 9-15 miles out to sea.
I think it’s interesting that to watch grossfat give away the game here. He pivoted from “save the whales” to “buhhhhhh my view!!”
To ifall’s point above, over their lifespan, wind turbines have something like a 40x lower carbon footprint than burning natural gas. View attachment 177240
Dong Energy is my new band name.First off, the picture you posted is not accurate to the windmills being proposed. Windmills do come in different sizes and the ones being planned for off of NJ are the biggest ones out there.
1. I don't think the topic of casinos has come up. You should start a thread about AC and its casinos. PS: What a shithole.
2. If I walk to the end of my street and look at Atlantic City you are precisely 10.1 miles from the Ocean Casino. I can assure you it is quite plainly visible. Imposing actually. The Atlantic Shores project has windmills as close as 9 miles from the Atlantic City, Brigantine and Long Beach Island beaches. Now keep in mind that the windmills that are going to be built will dwarf Ocean Casino.
Here is a picture I took of Ocean Casino standing on the Ocean City boardwalk at the end of 5th street. This is exactly 9.2 miles. The windmills proposed will be 143 feet taller than the top of the glowing ball on top of Ocean Casino.
View attachment 177264
Same vantage point on a clear night. In the picture below the top of the proposed windmills would be almost to the top of the frame of the picture.
View attachment 177265
This graphic shows you how much bigger the latest greatest windmills are compared to those of the past. The source of this picture is a pro windmills site touting these new monstrosities as a good thing.
View attachment 177267