REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
This is like all taxes.laidback said:There's a good chance they're going up quite a bit.
They say it's for the school & the children but the money will never reach the classrooms
https://laist.com/2019/06/03/measure_ee_lausd_tax_hike.phpMaxKookage said:Got a link to what is being proposed?
No, Prop 13 keeps us from being fucked yearly by a state government that's never seen a dollar they don't want to confiscatehal9000 said:Maybe you guys fvcked yourselves with prop 13 years ago.
And maybe the real topic here is not so much property taxes, but rather the state's school funding formula.
ifallalot said:No, Prop 13 keeps us from being fucked yearly by a state government that's never seen a dollar they don't want to confiscatehal9000 said:Maybe you guys fvcked yourselves with prop 13 years ago.
And maybe the real topic here is not so much property taxes, but rather the state's school funding formula.
The real topic isn't funding, its over-spending
Methinks I remember something about a "rainy day fund" that would be perfect in this situation.
I'm referring to the fact that California has a gigantic population. The guys who grew up there can probably attest to the fact that population growth has put a strain on resources and infrastructure in the state.laidback said:Are you referring to illegal immigration"out-of-control population growth".
Just another band-aid feelz tax increase that does nothing in the long run besides cost taxpayers moneyafoaf said:I think Garcetti has a point though...
these guys are already in the red, but an increased parcel tax is going to pay for raises?
what's going to pay off all the other debt?
what am I missing?
LAUSD has one of the largest per pupil expenditure rates in the country. It also has a declining student population.hal9000 said:ifallalot said:No, Prop 13 keeps us from being fucked yearly by a state government that's never seen a dollar they don't want to confiscatehal9000 said:Maybe you guys fvcked yourselves with prop 13 years ago.
And maybe the real topic here is not so much property taxes, but rather the state's school funding formula.
The real topic isn't funding, its over-spending
Methinks I remember something about a "rainy day fund" that would be perfect in this situation.
Fair points, and I'll admit that I don't have a great understanding of Prop 13 because I haven't done much research on it. But on the surface, it seems like it could have robbed school districts of funding and local control.
I think you may be using the term over-spending as a proxy for "out-of-control population growth".
Our state government has plenty of money already. We are taxed enough.GDaddy said:As I understand it the state's Constitution requires it to support public schools so - unlike a municipality - the counties and the school districts cannot be allowed to go bankrupt. Prop 13 came about in the first place to stabilize tax assessments and it was sold on the basis of preventing seniors and people living on fixed incomes from getting taxed out of their homes.
I think a compromise might involve removing the limitation on tax increases on everything except individual dwellings. That will mean tax assessments will float with the value - up or down - on residential apartment properties, retail, commercial, industrial, probably most forms of land and so on. It's still going to be hard for them to maintain schools in counties that are predominantly residential or government owned but those tend to be rural anyway.
So you are a liberal in conservatives clothing? You don't want to pay for what you use, but instead enjoy being subsidized by the wealthy.GromsDad said:Property taxes is one thing that I can't complain about personally. I life in a modest home in a summer seasonal beach town filled with multi-million dollar mansions, condos and beach homes. These homes don't generate kids in the school system and use virtually no city services 9 months out of the year. Basically huge ratables that use no city services. Because of that the property and school taxes on my modest 60s era split level on a nice sized lot are under $2,500 a year.