not trueLOL at Bush being underqualified. Here's the deal: Never in the history of the world, would anyone w/ Obama's qualifications ever even REMOTELY be considered as a candidate for President of the United States, let alone a party's ACTUAL nominee and now, president-elect.
Honestly, it's mind-bottling <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/foreheadslap.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/foreheadslap.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/foreheadslap.gif" alt="" />
experience hasn't always been a measure of president's ability to lead well.
James Buchanon had lots of gov. experience and is considered one of the worst, and Abraham Lincoln can be considered to have less fed. gov. experience than Obamas, so you never know.
but in the history of the world Obama's nomination isn't unheard of but his election is historic in many ways including his limited experience compared to most presidents.
I hope he can turn this country around, but he is a member of the demo/publiccans spend spend spend club so that doesn't bode well