Yes. point at camera, pull the triggerHe was supposed to point the gun at the Russian chick and pull the trigger?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes. point at camera, pull the triggerHe was supposed to point the gun at the Russian chick and pull the trigger?
Not pointed at the cameraHow many times do you need to be told a fact before you learn something?
View attachment 118384
View attachment 118385
Kook missed me twice.How many times do you need to be told a fact before you learn something?
View attachment 118384
View attachment 118385
This was a real firearmOnce again, it was a prop.
How about whoever hired the scab inexperienced underpaid armorer who put the bullet in the gun?whoever put that bullet in that gun is guilty. Everyone there was doing what they were supposed to be doing. Everything there was doing what it was supposed to be doing. That bullet was simply not supposed to be there and whoever put it there is guilty.
He’s got huge civil liability on this oneNo matter how much you hate Baldwin(so do I) for making fun of Don the Con or any other reason, this all on the armorer.
This.How about whoever hired the scab inexperienced underpaid armorer who put the bullet in the gun?
As someone who knows nothing about movie production, I am surprised that the person who pulls the trigger isn’t responsible for the impact of their actionsNo matter how much you hate Baldwin(so do I) for making fun of Don the Con or any other reason, this all on the armorer.
The Russian chick wasn’t a camera. Why was the gun even aimed at her?Yes. point at camera, pull the trigger
As someone that works behind the camera, it could have been you.How many times do you need to be told a fact before you learn something?
View attachment 118384
View attachment 118385
Which is why he knows more about this type of thing than any of you yahoos. Myself included, I spend very little time on set.As someone that works behind the camera, it could have been you.
Yes, it could have been me. Though the last thing I shot that involved guns, fake guns and digital muzzle flashes have been used. Just as well, since the scene called for the shootee POV angle.As someone that works behind the camera, it could have been you.
Donald Trump.the union/scab issue seems irrelevant unless it leads to a malicious motive by someone to put a bullet rather than blank in the gun
Drawing a gun? Why that’s almost as deadly as drawing Mohammed!I haven't read back on this thread, but I did hear yesterday that he was supposedly practicing drawing a gun when it went off.
Is this true?